Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on May 4, 2005
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2005 22(8):1661-1672; doi:10.1093/molbev/msi162
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/8/1661    most recent
msi162v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hollyoake, M.
Right arrow Articles by Aguado, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hollyoake, M.
Right arrow Articles by Aguado, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press 2005.

NKp30 (NCR3) is a Pseudogene in 12 Inbred and Wild Mouse Strains, but an Expressed Gene in Mus caroli

Martine Hollyoake*, R. Duncan Campbell* and Begoña Aguado*,{dagger}

* MRC Rosalind Franklin Centre for Genomics Research (formerly MRC UK HGMP Resource Centre), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom; and {dagger} Centro Nacional de Biotecnología–Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Campus Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain

E-mail: baguado{at}cnb.uam.es.

Ancient duplications and rearrangements of protein-coding segments have resulted in complex gene family relationships. As a result, gene products may acquire new specificities, altered recognition properties, modified functions, and even loss of functionality. The natural cytotoxicity receptor (NCR) family are natural killer (NK)–activating receptors whose members are NKp46 (NCR1), NKp44 (NCR2), and NKp30 (NCR3). The NCR proteins are putative immunoglobulin superfamily members whose ligands are unknown. The NKp46 gene is present and expressed in human and mouse, NKp44 is only present and expressed in human, and NKp30 is present and expressed in human but is a nonexpressed pseudogene in mouse. By searching databases we have detected alternatively spliced forms of the three NCR members. In addition, we have shown by reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis that the human NKp30 gene presents differential expression patterns in tissues. However, no expressed sequence tags (ESTs) are detected for mouse NKp30, and the genomic sequence contains two premature stop codons, which would encode a severely truncated nonfunctional protein. We have sequenced genomic DNA from 13 mouse inbred and wild strains and discovered that NKp30 is a pseudogene in every mouse strain sequenced except Mus caroli where two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) abolished the premature stop codons. We observed that the laboratory-inbred strains are, for the exonic sequences, genetically identical, except Mus m. musculus C3H. The Mus musculus strains only have a few SNPs, but the rest of the Mus strains have accumulated gradually several SNPs, mainly in the functional immunoglobulin and intracellular domains. RT-PCR analysis performed on RNA from M. caroli tissue samples identified two transcripts, one of which would encode a putative soluble NKp30 protein, also detected in rat but not in human. We have observed that the intracellular domains of NKp30 (and NKp46) are not conserved among the different species, with the most striking difference when comparing human against mouse and rat. The NKp44 gene is only found in human and shows three different splice forms varying in their "stalk" and intracellular domains. Searching for NKp44 orthologs, we found similarity to ESTs from a novel rodent TREM family member, which we termed TREM6, and not to any possible NKp44 ortholog.

Key Words: NCR • NKp30 • splice forms • pseudogene • Mus caroli • TREM6


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
S. Seth, A.-M. Georgoudaki, B. J. Chambers, Q. Qiu, E. Kremmer, M. K. Maier, N. Czeloth, I. Ravens, R. Foerster, and G. Bernhardt
Heterogeneous expression of the adhesion receptor CD226 on murine NK and T cells and its function in NK-mediated killing of immature dendritic cells
J. Leukoc. Biol., July 1, 2009; 86(1): 91 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
X. Xie, M. D. Stadnisky, and M. G. Brown
MHC Class I Dk Locus and Ly49G2+ NK Cells Confer H-2k Resistance to Murine Cytomegalovirus
J. Immunol., June 1, 2009; 182(11): 7163 - 7171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
A. De Maria, E. Ugolotti, E. Rutjens, S. Mazza, L. Radic, A. Faravelli, G. Koopman, E. Di Marco, P. Costa, B. Ensoli, et al.
NKp44 expression, phylogenesis and function in non-human primate NK cells
Int. Immunol., March 1, 2009; 21(3): 245 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Meyer, S. Seth, J. Albrecht, M. K. Maier, L. d. Pasquier, I. Ravens, L. Dreyer, R. Burger, M. Gramatzki, R. Schwinzer, et al.
CD96 Interaction with CD155 via Its First Ig-like Domain Is Modulated by Alternative Splicing or Mutations in Distal Ig-like Domains
J. Biol. Chem., January 23, 2009; 284(4): 2235 - 2244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. Walzer, M. Blery, J. Chaix, N. Fuseri, L. Chasson, S. H. Robbins, S. Jaeger, P. Andre, L. Gauthier, L. Daniel, et al.
Identification, activation, and selective in vivo ablation of mouse NK cells via NKp46
PNAS, February 27, 2007; 104(9): 3384 - 3389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. Yao, R. Charlab, and P. Li
Systematic identification of pseudogenes through whole genome expression evidence profiling
Nucleic Acids Res., September 11, 2006; 34(16): 4477 - 4485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.