MBE Advance Access originally published online on February 2, 2005
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2005 22(4):1137-1146; doi:10.1093/molbev/msi100
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Article |
The Evolution of Transcription-Initiation Sites
Department of Biology, Indiana University
E-mail: mlynch{at}bio.indiana.edu.
Unlike the situation in prokaryotes, most eukaryotic messenger RNAs contain a moderately long 5' untranslated region (UTR). Such leader sequences impose a burden on eukaryotic genes by providing substrate for the mutational origin of premature translation-initiation codons, which generally result in defective proteins. To gain an insight into the expansion of 5' UTRs in eukaryotic genomes, we present a simple null model in which the evolution of transcription-initiation sites is entirely driven by the stochastic mutational flux of core-promoter sequences and premature translation-initiation codons. This model yields results consistent with a variety of heretofore disconnected observations, including the form of length distributions of 5' UTRs, the relatively low variance in UTR features among distantly related eukaryotes, the universal reliance on relatively simple core-promoter sequences, and the elevated density of introns in the 5' UTR. We suggest that the reduced effective population sizes of most eukaryotes impose a population-genetic environment conducive to the movement of core promoters to random positions, subject to the constraint imposed by the upstream accumulation of premature translation-initiation codons. If this hypothesis is correct, then selection for gene-specific regulatory features need not be invoked to explain either the origin of lengthy eukaryotic 5' UTRs or the 1,000-fold range of 5'-UTR lengths among genes within species. Nevertheless, once permanently established, expanded 5' UTRs may have provided a novel substrate for the evolution of mechanisms for posttranscriptional regulation of eukaryotic gene expression. These results provide a further example of how an increase in the power of random genetic drift can passively promote the evolution of forms of gene architecture that ultimately facilitate the evolution of organismal complexity.
Key Words: Inr genome evolution TATA transcription initiation UTR eukaryotes
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Reuter, J. Engelstadter, P. Fontanillas, and L. D. Hurst A Test of the Null Model for 5' UTR Evolution Based on GC Content Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2008; 25(5): 801 - 804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Neafsey and J. E. Galagan Dual Modes of Natural Selection on Upstream Open Reading Frames Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2007; 24(8): 1744 - 1751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lynch Colloquium Papers: The frailty of adaptive hypotheses for the origins of organismal complexity PNAS, May 15, 2007; 104(suppl_1): 8597 - 8604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Roy, D. Penny, and D. E. Neafsey Evolutionary Conservation of UTR Intron Boundaries in Cryptococcus Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2007; 24(5): 1140 - 1148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Scofield, X. Hong, and M. Lynch Position of the Final Intron in Full-Length Transcripts: Determined by NMD? Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2007; 24(4): 896 - 899. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Giacomelli, A. S. Hancock, and J. Masel The Conversion of 3' UTRs into Coding Regions Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2007; 24(2): 457 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Hong, D. G. Scofield, and M. Lynch Intron Size, Abundance, and Distribution within Untranslated Regions of Genes Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2006; 23(12): 2392 - 2404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lynch, B. Koskella, and S. Schaack Mutation pressure and the evolution of organelle genomic architecture. Science, March 24, 2006; 311(5768): 1727 - 1730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lynch The Origins of Eukaryotic Gene Structure Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2006; 23(2): 450 - 468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


