MBE Advance Access originally published online on January 12, 2005
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2005 22(4):1044-1052; doi:10.1093/molbev/msi087
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Article |
Rates of Protein Evolution Are Positively Correlated with Developmental Timing of Expression During Mouse Spermatogenesis
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona
E-mail: jgood{at}email.arizona.edu.
Male reproductive genes often evolve very rapidly, and sexual selection is thought to be a primary force driving this divergence. We investigated the molecular evolution of 987 genes expressed at different times during mouse spermatogenesis to determine if the rate of evolution and the intensity of positive selection vary across stages of male gamete development. Using mouse-rat orthologs, we found that rates of protein evolution were positively correlated with the developmental timing of expression. Genes expressed early in spermatogenesis had rates of divergence similar to the genome median, while genes expressed after the onset of meiosis were found to evolve much more quickly. Rates of protein evolution were fastest for genes expressed during the dramatic morphogenesis of round spermatids into spermatozoa. Late-expressed genes were also more likely to be specific to the male germline. To test for evidence of positive selection, we analyzed the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous changes using a maximum likelihood framework in comparisons among mouse, rat, and human. Many genes showed evidence of positive selection, and most of these genes were expressed late in spermatogenesis and were testis specific. Overall, these data suggest that the intensity of positive selection associated with the evolution of male gametes varies considerably across development and acts primarily on phenotypes that develop late in spermatogenesis.
Key Words: Mus musculus pleiotropy sexual selection sperm development X chromosome
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. D. Dean, N. L. Clark, G. D. Findlay, R. C. Karn, X. Yi, W. J. Swanson, M. J. MacCoss, and M. W. Nachman Proteomics and Comparative Genomic Investigations Reveal Heterogeneity in Evolutionary Rate of Male Reproductive Proteins in Mice (Mus domesticus) Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2009; 26(8): 1733 - 1743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ramsay, L. H. Rieseberg, and K. Ritland The Correlation of Evolutionary Rate with Pathway Position in Plant Terpenoid Biosynthesis Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2009; 26(5): 1045 - 1053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Ramm, L. McDonald, J. L. Hurst, R. J. Beynon, and P. Stockley Comparative Proteomics Reveals Evidence for Evolutionary Diversification of Rodent Seminal Fluid and Its Functional Significance in Sperm Competition Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2009; 26(1): 189 - 198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Turner, E. B. Chuong, and H. E. Hoekstra Comparative Analysis of Testis Protein Evolution in Rodents Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 2075 - 2089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Good, M. D. Dean, and M. W. Nachman A Complex Genetic Basis to X-Linked Hybrid Male Sterility Between Two Species of House Mice Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 2213 - 2228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Llopart and J. M. Comeron Recurrent Events of Positive Selection in Independent Drosophila Lineages at the Spermatogenesis Gene roughex Genetics, June 1, 2008; 179(2): 1009 - 1020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Dean, J. M. Good, and M. W. Nachman Adaptive Evolution of Proteins Secreted during Sperm Maturation: An Analysis of the Mouse Epididymal Transcriptome Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2008; 25(2): 383 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Ramm, P. L. Oliver, C. P. Ponting, P. Stockley, and R. D. Emes Sexual Selection and the Adaptive Evolution of Mammalian Ejaculate Proteins Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2008; 25(1): 207 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Voolstra, D. Tautz, P. Farbrother, L. Eichinger, and B. Harr Contrasting evolution of expression differences in the testis between species and subspecies of the house mouse Genome Res., January 1, 2007; 17(1): 42 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Oka, T. Aoto, Y. Totsuka, R. Takahashi, M. Ueda, A. Mita, N. Sakurai-Yamatani, H. Yamamoto, S. Kuriki, N. Takagi, et al. Disruption of Genetic Interaction Between Two Autosomal Regions and the X Chromosome Causes Reproductive Isolation Between Mouse Strains Derived From Different Subspecies Genetics, January 1, 2007; 175(1): 185 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Metta, R. Gudavalli, J.-M. Gibert, and C. Schlotterer No Accelerated Rate of Protein Evolution in Male-Biased Drosophila pseudoobscura Genes Genetics, September 1, 2006; 174(1): 411 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Begun, H. A. Lindfors, M. E. Thompson, and A. K. Holloway Recently Evolved Genes Identified From Drosophila yakuba and D. erecta Accessory Gland Expressed Sequence Tags Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1675 - 1681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Wagstaff and D. J. Begun Molecular Population Genetics of Accessory Gland Protein Genes and Testis-Expressed Genes in Drosophila mojavensis and D. arizonae Genetics, November 1, 2005; 171(3): 1083 - 1101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


