Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on December 1, 2004
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2005 22(3):767-775; doi:10.1093/molbev/msi062
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Correction to PDF
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/3/767    most recent
msi062v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singer, G. A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Wolfe, K. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Singer, G. A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Wolfe, K. H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution vol. 22 no. 3 © Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution 2004; all rights reserved.

Research Article

Clusters of Co-expressed Genes in Mammalian Genomes Are Conserved by Natural Selection

Gregory A. C. Singer1, Andrew T. Lloyd2, Lukasz B. Huminiecki3 and Kenneth H. Wolfe

Department of Genetics, Smurfit Institute, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland

E-mail: gacsinger{at}gmail.com

Genes that belong to the same functional pathways are often packaged into operons in prokaryotes. However, aside from examples in nematode genomes, this form of transcriptional regulation appears to be absent in eukaryotes. Nevertheless, a number of recent studies have shown that gene order in eukaryotic genomes is not completely random, and that genes with similar expression patterns tend to be clustered together. What remains unclear is whether co-expressed genes have been gathered together by natural selection to facilitate their regulation, or if the genes are co-expressed simply by virtue of their being close together in the genome. Here, we show that gene expression clusters tend to contain fewer chromosomal breakpoints between human and mouse than expected by chance, which indicates that they are being held together by natural selection. This conclusion applies to clusters defined on the basis of broad (housekeeping) expression, or on the basis of correlated transcription profiles across tissues. Contrary to previous reports, we find that genes with high expression are not clustered to a greater extent than expected by chance and are not conserved during evolution.

Key Words: genome organization • human genome • mouse genome • natural selection


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Genome ResHome page
C. Morey, C. Kress, and W. A. Bickmore
Lack of bystander activation shows that localization exterior to chromosome territories is not sufficient to up-regulate gene expression
Genome Res., July 1, 2009; 19(7): 1184 - 1194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
T. Makino and A. McLysaght
Interacting Gene Clusters and the Evolution of the Vertebrate Immune System
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2008; 25(9): 1855 - 1862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
B.-Y. Liao and J. Zhang
Coexpression of Linked Genes in Mammalian Genomes Is Generally Disadvantageous
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2008; 25(8): 1555 - 1565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Genome ResHome page
P. Huang, E. D. Pleasance, J. S. Maydan, R. Hunt-Newbury, N. J. O'Neil, A. Mah, D. L. Baillie, M. A. Marra, D. G. Moerman, and S. J.M. Jones
Identification and analysis of internal promoters in Caenorhabditis elegans operons
Genome Res., October 1, 2007; 17(10): 1478 - 1485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Genome ResHome page
M. Huvet, S. Nicolay, M. Touchon, B. Audit, Y. d'Aubenton-Carafa, A. Arneodo, and C. Thermes
Human gene organization driven by the coordination of replication and transcription
Genome Res., September 1, 2007; 17(9): 1278 - 1285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Genome ResHome page
H. J. Gierman, M. H.G. Indemans, J. Koster, S. Goetze, J. Seppen, D. Geerts, R. van Driel, and R. Versteeg
Domain-wide regulation of gene expression in the human genome
Genome Res., September 1, 2007; 17(9): 1286 - 1295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. Crombach and P. Hogeweg
Chromosome Rearrangements and the Evolution of Genome Structuring and Adaptability
Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2007; 24(5): 1130 - 1139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
B. P. Cusack and K. H. Wolfe
Not Born Equal: Increased Rate Asymmetry in Relocated and Retrotransposed Rodent Gene Duplicates
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2007; 24(3): 679 - 686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Endocr. Rev.Home page
S. M. Clee and A. D. Attie
The Genetic Landscape of Type 2 Diabetes in Mice
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2007; 28(1): 48 - 83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. Semon and L. Duret
Evolutionary Origin and Maintenance of Coexpressed Gene Clusters in Mammals
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2006; 23(9): 1715 - 1723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.