Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on November 10, 2004
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2005 22(3):387-390; doi:10.1093/molbev/msi039
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Correction to PDF
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/3/387    most recent
msi039v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blair, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hedges, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blair, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hedges, S. B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution vol. 22 no. 3 © Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution 2004; all rights reserved.

Molecular Clocks Do Not Support the Cambrian Explosion

Jaime E. Blair and S. Blair Hedges

NASA Astrobiology Institute and Department of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park

E-mail: jeb322{at}psu.edu.

Abstract

The fossil record has long supported the view that most animal phyla originated during a brief period approximately 520 MYA known as the Cambrian explosion. However, molecular data analyses over the past 3 decades have found deeper divergences among animals (~800 to 1,200 MYA), with and without the assumption of a global molecular clock. Recently, two studies have instead reported time estimates apparently consistent with the fossil record. Here, we demonstrate that methodological problems in these studies cast doubt on the accuracy and interpretations of the results obtained. In the study by Peterson et al., young time estimates were obtained because fossil calibrations were used as maximum limits rather than as minimum limits, and not because invertebrate calibrations were used. In the study by Aris-Brosou and Yang, young time estimates were obtained because of problems with rate models and other methods specific to the study, and not because Bayesian methods were used. This also led to many anomalous findings in their study, including a primate-rodent divergence at 320 MYA. With these results aside, molecular clocks continue to support a long period of animal evolution before the Cambrian explosion of fossils.

Key Words: animals • Metazoa • time estimation • evolution • fossil record


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
T. Lepage, D. Bryant, H. Philippe, and N. Lartillot
A General Comparison of Relaxed Molecular Clock Models
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2007; 24(12): 2669 - 2680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
P. Cartwright and A. Collins
Fossils and phylogenies: integrating multiple lines of evidence to investigate the origin of early major metazoan lineages
Integr. Comp. Biol., November 1, 2007; 47(5): 744 - 751.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
L. A. Hug and A. J. Roger
The Impact of Fossils and Taxon Sampling on Ancient Molecular Dating Analyses
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2007; 24(8): 1889 - 1897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PaleobiologyHome page
S. Bengtson, B. Rasmussen, and B. Krapez
The Paleoproterozoic megascopic Stirling biota
Paleobiology, June 1, 2007; 33(3): 351 - 381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. B. Smith, D. Pisani, J. A. Mackenzie-Dodds, B. Stockley, B. L. Webster, and D. T. J. Littlewood
Testing the Molecular Clock: Molecular and Paleontological Estimates of Divergence Times in the Echinoidea (Echinodermata)
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2006; 23(10): 1832 - 1851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
C. Berney and J. Pawlowski
A molecular time-scale for eukaryote evolution recalibrated with the continuous microfossil record
Proc R Soc B, August 7, 2006; 273(1596): 1867 - 1872.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
A. J Roger and L. A Hug
The origin and diversification of eukaryotes: problems with molecular phylogenetics and molecular clock estimation
Phil Trans R Soc B, June 29, 2006; 361(1470): 1039 - 1054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
S. Conway Morris
Darwin's dilemma: the realities of the Cambrian 'explosion'
Phil Trans R Soc B, June 29, 2006; 361(1470): 1069 - 1083.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. E. Blair and S. B. Hedges
Molecular Phylogeny and Divergence Times of Deuterostome Animals
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2005; 22(11): 2275 - 2284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. J. Peterson and N. J. Butterfield
From The Cover: Origin of the Eumetazoa: Testing ecological predictions of molecular clocks against the Proterozoic fossil record
PNAS, July 5, 2005; 102(27): 9547 - 9552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.