MBE Advance Access originally published online on August 24, 2005
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2005 22(12):2519-2530; doi:10.1093/molbev/msi246
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Article |
Intragenic Hill-Robertson Interference Influences Selection Intensity on Synonymous Mutations in Drosophila
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Iowa
Email: josep-comeron{at}uiowa.edu
Natural selection influences synonymous mutations and synonymous codon usage in many eukaryotes to improve the efficiency of translation in highly expressed genes. Recent studies of gene composition in eukaryotes have shown that codon usage also varies independently of expression levels, both among genes and at the intragenic level. Here, we investigate rates of evolution (Ks) and intensity of selection (
s) on synonymous mutations in two groups of genes that differ greatly in the length of their exons, but with equivalent levels of gene expression and rates of crossing-over in Drosophila melanogaster. We estimate s using patterns of divergence and polymorphism in 50 Drosophila genes (100 kb of coding sequence) to take into account possible variation in mutation trends across the genome, among genes or among codons. We show that genes with long exons exhibit higher Ks and reduced s compared to genes with short exons. We also show that Ks and s vary significantly across long exons, with higher Ks and reduced s in the central region compared to flanking regions of the same exons, hence indicating that the difference between genes with short and long exons can be mostly attributed to the central region of these long exons. Although amino acid composition can also play a significant role when estimating Ks and s, our analyses show that the differences in Ks and s between genes with short and long exons and across long exons cannot be explained by differences in protein composition. All these results are consistent with the Interference Selection (IS) model that proposes that the Hill-Robertson (HR) effect caused by many weakly selected mutations has detectable evolutionary consequences at the intragenic level in genomes with recombination. Under the IS model, exon size and exon-intron structure influence the effectiveness of selection, with long exons showing reduced effectiveness of selection when compared to small exons and the central region of long exons showing reduced intensity of selection compared to flanking coding regions. Finally, our results further stress the need to consider selection on synonymous mutations and its variation—among and across genes and exons—in studies of protein evolution.
Key Words: codon bias • weak selection • gene structure • gene conversion bias • interference selection
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. Hadany and J. M. Comeron Why Are Sex and Recombination So Common? Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., June 1, 2008; 1133(1): 26 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Llopart and J. M. Comeron Recurrent Events of Positive Selection in Independent Drosophila Lineages at the Spermatogenesis Gene roughex Genetics, June 1, 2008; 179(2): 1009 - 1020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Ke, X. H.-F. Zhang, and L. A. Chasin Positive selection acting on splicing motifs reflects compensatory evolution Genome Res., April 1, 2008; 18(4): 533 - 543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. D. Cutter, J. D. Wasmuth, and N. L. Washington Patterns of Molecular Evolution in Caenorhabditis Preclude Ancient Origins of Selfing Genetics, April 1, 2008; 178(4): 2093 - 2104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Warnecke and L. D. Hurst Evidence for a Trade-Off between Translational Efficiency and Splicing Regulation in Determining Synonymous Codon Usage in Drosophila melanogaster Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2007; 24(12): 2755 - 2762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. Jensen, V. L. Bauer DuMont, A. B. Ashmore, A. Gutierrez, and C. F. Aquadro Patterns of Sequence Variability and Divergence at the diminutive Gene Region of Drosophila melanogaster: Complex Patterns Suggest an Ancestral Selective Sweep Genetics, October 1, 2007; 177(2): 1071 - 1085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Loewe and B. Charlesworth Background Selection in Single Genes May Explain Patterns of Codon Bias Genetics, March 1, 2007; 175(3): 1381 - 1393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. C. Presgraves Intron Length Evolution in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2006; 23(11): 2203 - 2213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Proschel, Z. Zhang, and J. Parsch Widespread Adaptive Evolution of Drosophila Genes With Sex-Biased Expression Genetics, October 1, 2006; 174(2): 893 - 900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. L. Halligan and P. D. Keightley Ubiquitous selective constraints in the Drosophila genome revealed by a genome-wide interspecies comparison Genome Res., July 1, 2006; 16(7): 875 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. M. Comeron Weak selection and recent mutational changes influence polymorphic synonymous mutations in humans PNAS, May 2, 2006; 103(18): 6940 - 6945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Akashi, W.-Y. Ko, S. Piao, A. John, P. Goel, C.-F. Lin, and A. P. Vitins Molecular Evolution in the Drosophila melanogaster Species Subgroup: Frequent Parameter Fluctuations on the Timescale of Molecular Divergence Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1711 - 1726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|