MBE Advance Access originally published online on August 24, 2005
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2005 22(12):2318-2342; doi:10.1093/molbev/msi242
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Review |
Selectionism and Neutralism in Molecular Evolution
Department of Biology, Institute of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics, 328 Mueller Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University
E-mail: nxm2{at}psu.edu.
Charles Darwin proposed that evolution occurs primarily by natural selection, but this view has been controversial from the beginning. Two of the major opposing views have been mutationism and neutralism. Early molecular studies suggested that most amino acid substitutions in proteins are neutral or nearly neutral and the functional change of proteins occurs by a few key amino acid substitutions. This suggestion generated an intense controversy over selectionism and neutralism. This controversy is partially caused by Kimura's definition of neutrality, which was too strict 
If we define neutral mutations as the mutations that do not change the function of gene products appreciably, many controversies disappear because slightly deleterious and slightly advantageous mutations are engulfed by neutral mutations. The ratio of the rate of nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution to that of synonymous substitution is a useful quantity to study positive Darwinian selection operating at highly variable genetic loci, but it does not necessarily detect adaptively important codons. Previously, multigene families were thought to evolve following the model of concerted evolution, but new evidence indicates that most of them evolve by a birth-and-death process of duplicate genes. It is now clear that most phenotypic characters or genetic systems such as the adaptive immune system in vertebrates are controlled by the interaction of a number of multigene families, which are often evolutionarily related and are subject to birth-and-death evolution. Therefore, it is important to study the mechanisms of gene family interaction for understanding phenotypic evolution. Because gene duplication occurs more or less at random, phenotypic evolution contains some fortuitous elements, though the environmental factors also play an important role. The randomness of phenotypic evolution is qualitatively different from allele frequency changes by random genetic drift. However, there is some similarity between phenotypic and molecular evolution with respect to functional or environmental constraints and evolutionary rate. It appears that mutation (including gene duplication and other DNA changes) is the driving force of evolution at both the genic and the phenotypic levels.
Key Words: neutral evolution • positive selection • multigene families • new genetic systems • neo-Darwinism • neomutationism
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. L. Hughes Near Neutrality: Leading Edge of the Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., June 1, 2008; 1133(1): 162 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Alonso, S. Lopez, N. Izagirre, and C. de la Rua Overdominance in the Human Genome and Olfactory Receptor Activity Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2008; 25(5): 997 - 1001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Houzelstein, I. R. Goncalves, A. Orth, F. Bonhomme, and P. Netter Lgals6, a 2-Million-Year-Old Gene in Mice: A Case of Positive Darwinian Selection and Presence/Absence Polymorphism Genetics, March 1, 2008; 178(3): 1533 - 1545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Matsuo Rapid Evolution of Two Odorant-Binding Protein Genes, Obp57d and Obp57e, in the Drosophila melanogaster Species Group Genetics, February 1, 2008; 178(2): 1061 - 1072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. I. Nikolaev, J. I. Montoya-Burgos, K. Popadin, L. Parand, E. H. Margulies, National Institutes of Health Intramural Sequencin, and S. E. Antonarakis Life-history traits drive the evolutionary rates of mammalian coding and noncoding genomic elements PNAS, December 18, 2007; 104(51): 20443 - 20448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Hallatschek, P. Hersen, S. Ramanathan, and D. R. Nelson Genetic drift at expanding frontiers promotes gene segregation PNAS, December 11, 2007; 104(50): 19926 - 19930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Nei The new mutation theory of phenotypic evolution PNAS, July 24, 2007; 104(30): 12235 - 12242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Lynch Colloquium Papers: The frailty of adaptive hypotheses for the origins of organismal complexity PNAS, May 15, 2007; 104(suppl_1): 8597 - 8604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Takahata Molecular Clock: An Anti-neo-Darwinian Legacy Genetics, May 1, 2007; 176(1): 1 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. A. Sawyer, J. Parsch, Z. Zhang, and D. L. Hartl Inaugural Article: Prevalence of positive selection among nearly neutral amino acid replacements in Drosophila PNAS, April 17, 2007; 104(16): 6504 - 6510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Mustonen and M. Lassig Adaptations to fluctuating selection in Drosophila PNAS, February 13, 2007; 104(7): 2277 - 2282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Freeling and B. C. Thomas Gene-balanced duplications, like tetraploidy, provide predictable drive to increase morphological complexity Genome Res., July 1, 2006; 16(7): 805 - 814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Charlesworth and A. Eyre-Walker The Rate of Adaptive Evolution in Enteric Bacteria Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2006; 23(7): 1348 - 1356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|