MBE Advance Access originally published online on September 8, 2004
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2005 22(1):74-84; doi:10.1093/molbev/msh255
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Article |
Phylogenetic Mapping of Intron Positions: A Case Study of Translation Initiation Factor eIF2
Department of Genetics, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
E-mail address: krauss{at}rz.uni-leipzig.de.
Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2) is a G protein that delivers the methionyl initiator tRNA to the small ribosomal subunit and releases it upon GTP hydrolysis after the recognition of the initiation codon. eIF2 is composed of three subunits,
, ß, and
. Subunit
shows the strongest conservation, and it confers both tRNA and GTP/GDP binding. Using intron positioning and protein sequence alignment, here we show that eIF2
is a suitable phylogenetic marker for eukaryotes. We determined or completed the sequences of 13 arthropod eIF2
genes. Analyzing the phylogenetic distribution of 52 different intron positions in 55 distantly related eIF2
genes, we identified ancient ones and shared derived introns in our data set. Obviously, intron positioning in eIF2
is evolutionarily conserved. However, there were episodes of complete and partial intron losses followed by intron gains. We identified 17 clusters of intron positions based on their distribution. The evolution of these clusters appears to be connected with preferred exon length and can be used to estimate the relative timing of intron gain because nearby precursor introns had to be erased from the gene before the new introns could be inserted. Moreover, we identified a putative case of intron sliding that constitutes a synapomorphic character state supporting monophyly of Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, and Diptera excluding Hymenoptera. We also performed tree reconstructions using the eIF2
protein sequences and intron positioning as phylogenetic information. Our results support the monophyly of Viridoplantae, Ascomycota, Homobasidiomyceta, and Apicomplexa.
Key Words: eIF2
intron evolution molecular phylogenetics intron clustering arthropod phylogeny intron sliding
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Krauss, C. Thummler, F. Georgi, J. Lehmann, P. F. Stadler, and C. Eisenhardt Near Intron Positions Are Reliable Phylogenetic Markers: An Application to Holometabolous Insects Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2008; 25(5): 821 - 830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Irimia and S. W. Roy Spliceosomal introns as tools for genomic and evolutionary analysis Nucleic Acids Res., March 1, 2008; 36(5): 1703 - 1712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. K. Dearden, M. J. Wilson, L. Sablan, P. W. Osborne, M. Havler, E. McNaughton, K. Kimura, N. V. Milshina, M. Hasselmann, T. Gempe, et al. Patterns of conservation and change in honey bee developmental genes Genome Res., November 1, 2006; 16(11): 1376 - 1384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Savard, D. Tautz, S. Richards, G. M. Weinstock, R. A. Gibbs, J. H. Werren, H. Tettelin, and M. J. Lercher Phylogenomic analysis reveals bees and wasps (Hymenoptera) at the base of the radiation of Holometabolous insects Genome Res., November 1, 2006; 16(11): 1334 - 1338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. V. Sverdlov, I. B. Rogozin, V. N. Babenko, and E. V. Koonin Conservation versus parallel gains in intron evolution Nucleic Acids Res., March 23, 2005; 33(6): 1741 - 1748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


