MBE Advance Access originally published online on April 14, 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mol. Biol. Evol. 21(7):1445-1454. 2004
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msh147
© 2004 by the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. ISSN: 0737-4038
Research Article |
The Chloroplast Genome of Nymphaea alba: Whole-Genome Analyses and the Problem of Identifying the Most Basal Angiosperm


* Institut für Spezielle Botanik, Universität Jena, Jena, Germany
Zentrum Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
Klinik für Innere Medizin, Universität Jena, Jena, Germany
E-mail: Vadim.Goremykin{at}uni-jena.de.
Abstract
Angiosperms (flowering plants) dominate contemporary terrestrial flora with roughly 250,000 species, but their origin and early evolution are still poorly understood. In recent years, molecular evidence has accumulated suggesting a dicotyledonous origin of monocots. Phylogenetic reconstructions have suggested that several dicotyledonous groups that include taxa such as Amborella, Austrobaileya, and Nymphaea branch off as the most basal among angiosperms. This has led to the concept of monocots, "eudicots," "basal dicots," and "ANITA" groupings. Here, we present the sequence and phylogenetic analyses of the chloroplast DNA of Nymphaea alba. Phylogenetic analyses of our 14-species data set, consisting of 29,991 aligned nucleotide positions per chloroplast genome, revealed consistent support for Nymphaea being a divergent member of a monophyletic dicot assemblage. Three distinct angiosperm lineages were supported in the majority of our phylogenetic analyseseudicots, Magnoliopsida, and monocots. However, the monocot lineage leading to the grasses was the deepest branching. Although analyses of only one individual gene alignment (out of 61) is consistent with some recently proposed hypotheses for the paraphyly of dicots, we also report observations that nine genes do not support paraphyly of dicots. Instead, they support the basal monocot-dicot split. Consistent with this finding, we also report observations suggesting that the monocot lineage leading to the grasses has the strongest phylogenetic affinity to gymnosperms. Our findings have general implications for studies of substitution model specification and analyses of concatenated genome data.
Key Words: Nymphaea chloroplast genomes angiosperms gymnosperms molecular evolution substitution rates
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Wu and E. Susko General Heterotachy and Distance Method Adjustments Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2009; 26(12): 2689 - 2697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Graham and W. J. D. Iles Different gymnosperm outgroups have (mostly) congruent signal regarding the root of flowering plant phylogeny Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2009; 96(1): 216 - 227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Jansen, Z. Cai, L. A. Raubeson, H. Daniell, C. W. dePamphilis, J. Leebens-Mack, K. F. Muller, M. Guisinger-Bellian, R. C. Haberle, A. K. Hansen, et al. Analysis of 81 genes from 64 plastid genomes resolves relationships in angiosperms and identifies genome-scale evolutionary patterns PNAS, December 4, 2007; 104(49): 19369 - 19374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Theissen and R. Melzer Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Origin and Diversification of the Angiosperm Flower Ann. Bot., September 1, 2007; 100(3): 603 - 619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Susko and A. J. Roger On Reduced Amino Acid Alphabets for Phylogenetic Inference Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2007; 24(9): 2139 - 2150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gatesy, R. DeSalle, and N. Wahlberg How Many Genes Should a Systematist Sample? Conflicting Insights from a Phylogenomic Matrix Characterized by Replicated Incongruence Syst Biol, April 1, 2007; 56(2): 355 - 363. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-C. Wang, M. Spencer, E. Susko, and A. J. Roger Testing for Covarion-like Evolution in Protein Sequences Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2007; 24(1): 294 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Bateman, J. Hilton, and P. J. Rudall Morphological and molecular phylogenetic context of the angiosperms: contrasting the 'top-down' and 'bottom-up' approaches used to infer the likely characteristics of the first flowers J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2006; 57(13): 3471 - 3503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Holland, L. S. Jermiin, and V. Moulton Improved Consensus Network Techniques for Genome-Scale Phylogeny Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2006; 23(5): 848 - 855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-C. Chang, H.-C. Lin, I-P. Lin, T.-Y. Chow, H.-H. Chen, W.-H. Chen, C.-H. Cheng, C.-Y. Lin, S.-M. Liu, C.-C. Chang, et al. The Chloroplast Genome of Phalaenopsis aphrodite (Orchidaceae): Comparative Analysis of Evolutionary Rate with that of Grasses and Its Phylogenetic Implications Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2006; 23(2): 279 - 291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Leebens-Mack, L. A. Raubeson, L. Cui, J. V. Kuehl, M. H. Fourcade, T. W. Chumley, J. L. Boore, R. K. Jansen, and C. W. dePamphilis Identifying the Basal Angiosperm Node in Chloroplast Genome Phylogenies: Sampling One's Way Out of the Felsenstein Zone Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2005; 22(10): 1948 - 1963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. V. Goremykin, B. Holland, K. I. Hirsch-Ernst, and F. H. Hellwig Analysis of Acorus calamus Chloroplast Genome and Its Phylogenetic Implications Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2005; 22(9): 1813 - 1822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Ane, J. G. Burleigh, M. M. McMahon, and M. J. Sanderson Covarion Structure in Plastid Genome Evolution: A New Statistical Test Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2005; 22(4): 914 - 924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Fourquin, M. Vinauger-Douard, B. Fogliani, C. Dumas, and C. P. Scutt Evidence that CRABS CLAW and TOUSLED have conserved their roles in carpel development since the ancestor of the extant angiosperms PNAS, March 22, 2005; 102(12): 4649 - 4654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





