Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on April 14, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/7/1391    most recent
msh141v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Canino, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Bentzen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Canino, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Bentzen, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mol. Biol. Evol. 21(7):1391-1400. 2004
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msh141
© 2004 by the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. ISSN: 0737-4038


Research Article

Evidence for Positive Selection at the Pantophysin (Pan I) Locus in Walleye Pollock, Theragra chalcogramma

M. F. Canino1 and P. Bentzen2

School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle

E-mail: mike.canino{at}noaa.gov.

Abstract

Nucleotide polymorphism at the pantophysin (Pan I) locus in walleye pollock, Theragra chalcogramma, was examined using DNA sequence data. Two distinct allelic lineages were detected in pollock, resulting from three amino acid replacement mutations in the first intravesicular domain of the protein. The common Pan I allelic group, comprising 94% of the samples, was less polymorphic ({pi} = 0.005) than the uncommon group ({pi} = 0.008), and nucleotide diversity in both was higher than for two allelic lineages in the related Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua. Phylogenetic analyses of Pan I sequences from these two species did not clearly resolve orthology among allelic groups, in part because of recombination that has occurred between the two pollock lineages. Conventional tests of neutrality comparing polymorphisms within and between homologous regions of the Pan I locus in walleye pollock and Atlantic cod did not detect the effects of selection. This result is likely attributed to low levels of synonymous divergence among allelic lineages and a lack of mutation-drift equilibrium inferred from nucleotide mismatch frequency distributions. However, the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions per site (dN/dS) exceeded unity in two intravesicular domains of the protein and the influence of positive selection at multiple codon sites was strongly inferred through the use of maximum-likelihood analyses. In addition, the frequency spectrum of linked neutral variation showed indirect effects of adaptive hitchhiking in pollock resulting from a selective sweep of the common allelic lineage. Recombination between the two allelic classes may have prevented complete loss of the older, more polymorphic lineage. The results suggest that recurrent sweeps driven by positive selection is the principle mode of evolution at the Pan I locus in gadid fishes.

Key Words: positive selection • pantophysin • walleye pollock • maximum likelihood


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
D. Brickman, G. Marteinsdottir, K. Logemann, and I. H. Harms
Drift probabilities for Icelandic cod larvae
ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2007; 64(1): 49 - 59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J HeredHome page
W. S. Grant, I. B. Spies, and M. F. Canino
Biogeographic Evidence for Selection on Mitochondrial DNA in North Pacific Walleye Pollock Theragra chalcogramma
J. Hered., November 1, 2006; 97(6): 571 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.