Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on March 10, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/7/1332    most recent
msh117v2
msh117v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (50)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mol. Biol. Evol. 21(7):1332-1339. 2004
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msh117
© 2004 by the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. ISSN: 0737-4038


Research Article

Frequent False Detection of Positive Selection by the Likelihood Method with Branch-Site Models

Jianzhi Zhang

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

E-mail: jianzhi{at}umich.edu.

Abstract

Positive Darwinian selection promotes fixations of advantageous mutations during gene evolution and is probably responsible for most adaptations. Detecting positive selection at the DNA sequence level is of substantial interest because such information provides significant insights into possible functional alterations during gene evolution as well as important nucleotide substitutions involved in adaptation. Efficient detection of positive selection, however, has been difficult because selection often operates on only a few sites in a short period of evolutionary time. A likelihood-based method with branch-site models was recently introduced to overcome such difficulties. Here I examine the accuracy of the method using computer simulation. I find that the method detects positive selection in 20%–70% of cases when the DNA sequences are generated by computer simulation under no positive selection. Although the frequency of such false detection varies depending on, among other things, the tree topology, branch length, and selection scheme, the branch-site likelihood method generally gives misleading results. Thus, detection of positive selection by this method alone is unreliable. This unreliability may have resulted from its over-sensitivity to violations of assumptions made in the method, such as certain distributions of selective strength among sites and equal transition/transversion ratios for synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions.

Key Words: likelihood • computer simulation • positive selection • branch-site model • molecular evolution


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genome ResHome page
R. A. Studer, S. Penel, L. Duret, and M. Robinson-Rechavi
Pervasive positive selection on duplicated and nonduplicated vertebrate protein coding genes
Genome Res., September 1, 2008; 18(9): 1393 - 1402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
B. D. Rodgers and D. K. Garikipati
Clinical, Agricultural, and Evolutionary Biology of Myostatin: A Comparative Review
Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2008; 29(5): 513 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J HeredHome page
C. Matsuba, J. U. Palo, S. L. Kuzmin, and J. Merila
Evidence for Multiple Retroposition Events and Gene Evolution in the ADP/ATP Translocase Gene Family in Ranid Frogs
J. Hered., July 19, 2007; (2007) esm038v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. A. Bakewell, P. Shi, and J. Zhang
More genes underwent positive selection in chimpanzee evolution than in human evolution
PNAS, May 1, 2007; 104(18): 7489 - 7494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. Anisimova and Z. Yang
Multiple Hypothesis Testing to Detect Lineages under Positive Selection that Affects Only a Few Sites
Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2007; 24(5): 1219 - 1228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
T. Hernandez-Hernandez, L. P. Martinez-Castilla, and E. R. Alvarez-Buylla
Functional Diversification of B MADS-Box Homeotic Regulators of Flower Development: Adaptive Evolution in Protein-Protein Interaction Domains after Major Gene Duplication Events
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2007; 24(2): 465 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
N. Izagirre, I. Garcia, C. Junquera, C. de la Rua, and S. Alonso
A Scan for Signatures of Positive Selection in Candidate Loci for Skin Pigmentation in Humans
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2006; 23(9): 1697 - 1706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
J. M. Akey, W. J. Swanson, J. Madeoy, M. Eberle, and M. D. Shriver
TRPV6 exhibits unusual patterns of polymorphism and divergence in worldwide populations
Hum. Mol. Genet., July 1, 2006; 15(13): 2106 - 2113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. H. Zakon, Y. Lu, D. J. Zwickl, and D. M. Hillis
Sodium channel genes and the evolution of diversity in communication signals of electric fishes: Convergent molecular evolution
PNAS, March 7, 2006; 103(10): 3675 - 3680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
P. Shi and J. Zhang
Contrasting Modes of Evolution Between Vertebrate Sweet/Umami Receptor Genes and Bitter Receptor Genes
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2006; 23(2): 292 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
H. Tang and C.-I Wu
A New Method for Estimating Nonsynonymous Substitutions and Its Applications to Detecting Positive Selection
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2006; 23(2): 372 - 379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. Nei
Selectionism and Neutralism in Molecular Evolution
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2005; 22(12): 2318 - 2342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. Mondragon-Palomino and B. S. Gaut
Gene Conversion and the Evolution of Three Leucine-Rich Repeat Gene Families in Arabidopsis thaliana
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2005; 22(12): 2444 - 2456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. Zhang, R. Nielsen, and Z. Yang
Evaluation of an Improved Branch-Site Likelihood Method for Detecting Positive Selection at the Molecular Level
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2005; 22(12): 2472 - 2479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
Y. Li, C. Ye, P. Shi, X.-J. Zou, R. Xiao, Y.-Y. Gong, and Y.-P. Zhang
Independent origin of the growth hormone gene family in New World monkeys and Old World monkeys/hominoids
J. Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2005; 35(2): 399 - 409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. J. B. Krieger and K. G. Ross
Molecular Evolutionary Analyses of the Odorant-Binding Protein Gene Gp-9 in Fire Ants and Other Solenopsis Species
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2005; 22(10): 2090 - 2103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
O. Podlaha, D. M. Webb, P. K. Tucker, and J. Zhang
Positive Selection for Indel Substitutions in the Rodent Sperm Protein Catsper1
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2005; 22(9): 1845 - 1852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
D. J. Lynn, A. R. Freeman, C. Murray, and D. G. Bradley
A Genomics Approach to the Detection of Positive Selection in Cattle: Adaptive Evolution of the T-Cell and Natural Killer Cell-Surface Protein CD2
Genetics, July 1, 2005; 170(3): 1189 - 1196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
D. T. Gerrard and D. A. Filatov
Positive and Negative Selection on Mammalian Y Chromosomes
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2005; 22(6): 1423 - 1432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
R. Friedman and A. L. Hughes
The Pattern of Nucleotide Difference at Individual Codons Among Mouse, Rat, and Human
Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2005; 22(5): 1285 - 1289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. L. Hughes and R. Friedman
Variation in the Pattern of Synonymous and Nonsynonymous Difference Between Two Fungal Genomes
Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2005; 22(5): 1320 - 1324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. Yokoyama and N. Takenaka
Statistical and Molecular Analyses of Evolutionary Significance of Red-Green Color Vision and Color Blindness in Vertebrates
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2005; 22(4): 968 - 975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
D. G. Torgerson and R. S. Singh
Rapid Evolution Through Gene Duplication and Subfunctionalization of the Testes-Specific {alpha}4 Proteasome Subunits in Drosophila
Genetics, November 1, 2004; 168(3): 1421 - 1432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. P. Bielawski, K. A. Dunn, G. Sabehi, and O. Beja
Darwinian adaptation of proteorhodopsin to different light intensities in the marine environment
PNAS, October 12, 2004; 101(41): 14824 - 14829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.