Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on January 22, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/3/612    most recent
msh052v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (27)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gontcharov, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Melkonian, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gontcharov, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Melkonian, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mol. Biol. Evol. 21(3):612-624. 2004
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msh052
© 2004 by the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. ISSN: 0737-4038

Are Combined Analyses Better Than Single Gene Phylogenies? A Case Study Using SSU rDNA and rbcL Sequence Comparisons in the Zygnematophyceae (Streptophyta)

Andrey A. Gontcharov1, Birger Marin and Michael Melkonian

Botanisches Institut, Lehrstuhl I, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Germany

E-mail: gontcharov{at}ibss.dvo.ru.

Although the combination of different genes in phylogenetic analyses is a promising approach, the methodology is not well established and analyses often suffer from inadequate, noncongruent taxon sampling, long-branch attraction, or conflicting evolutionary models of the genes analyzed. Conflicts or congruence between multigene and single-gene phylogenies, as well as the assumed superiority of the multigene approach, are often difficult to assess solely because of incongruent taxon sampling. In the present study, a data set of 43 nuclear-encoded SSU rDNA and plastid-encoded rbcL gene sequences was generated from the same strains of conjugating green algae (Zygnematophyceae, Streptophyta). Phylogenetic analyses used the genes individually and in combination, either as concatenated sequences or with the log-likelihood summation method. Single-gene analyses, although mostly congruent, revealed some conflicting nodes and showed different patterns of statistical support. Combined analyses confidently resolved the conflicts between the single-gene analyses, enhanced phylogenetic resolution, and were better supported by morphological information. Long-branch taxa were not the same for the two genes analyzed, and, thus, their effect on phylogenetic resolution was minimized in the combined analyses.

Key Words: Combined analyses • phylogeny • rbcL • SSU rDNA • Streptophyta • Zygnematophyceae


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. D. Hall, R. M. McCourt, and C. F. Delwiche
Patterns of cell division in the filamentous Desmidiaceae, close green algal relatives of land plants
Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2008; 95(6): 643 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.Home page
T. Stoeck, S. Jost, and J. Boenigk
Multigene phylogenies of clonal Spumella-like strains, a cryptic heterotrophic nanoflagellate, isolated from different geographical regions
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, March 1, 2008; 58(3): 716 - 724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T.-K. Seo, H. Kishino, and J. L. Thorne
Incorporating gene-specific variation when inferring and evaluating optimal evolutionary tree topologies from multilocus sequence data
PNAS, March 22, 2005; 102(12): 4436 - 4441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.