Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on August 18, 2004
Molecular Biology and Evolution 2004 21(12):2256-2264; doi:10.1093/molbev/msh236
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/12/2256    most recent
msh236v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bulmer, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Crozier, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bulmer, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Crozier, R. H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution vol. 21 no. 12 © Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution 2004; all rights reserved.

Research Article

Duplication and Diversifying Selection Among Termite Antifungal Peptides

Mark S. Bulmer and Ross H. Crozier

School of Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia

E-mail: mark.bulmer{at}jcu.edu.au.

We have identified and analyzed the mRNA sequence of 20 new defensin-like peptides from 11 Australian termite species of Nasutitermes and from an outgroup, Drepanotermes rubriceps. The sequence was amplified by reverse transcriptase PCR with a degenerate primer designed from termicin, an antifungal peptide previously characterized from the termite Pseudocanthotermes spiniger. All 20 genes show high sequence identity with P. spiniger termicin and have duplicated repeatedly during the radiation of Nasutitermes. Comparison of the relative fixation rates of synonymous (silent) and nonsynonymous (amino acid altering) mutations indicates that the Nasutitermes termicins are positively selected. This positive selection appears to drive a decrease in termicin charge. In termites with two genes, the decrease in charge is predominantly restricted to one termicin. Furthermore, the spread of charge is significantly greater within species than across species among amino acid sites that appear to be under strong positive selection and this spread is attributable to only three sites. Our results suggest that after termicin duplication, certain critical sites have maintained a positive charge in one duplicate and evolved towards neutrality in the other and that positive selection has directed these changes repeatedly and independently. This diversification among duplicated genes may be a counter-response to the evolution of fungal resistance in social insects that are particularly vulnerable to fungal epidemics.

Key Words: immune genes • termites • diversifying selection • gene duplication • termicins • defensins • protein evolution


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 GeneticsHome page
E. G. Bakker, M. B. Traw, C. Toomajian, M. Kreitman, and J. Bergelson
Low Levels of Polymorphism in Genes That Control the Activation of Defense Response in Arabidopsis thaliana
Genetics, April 1, 2008; 178(4): 2031 - 2043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. S. Bulmer and R. H. Crozier
Variation in Positive Selection in Termite GNBPs and Relish
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2006; 23(2): 317 - 326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
F. M. Jiggins and K.-W. Kim
The Evolution of Antifungal Peptides in Drosophila
Genetics, December 1, 2005; 171(4): 1847 - 1859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.