Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on August 29, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/1/45    most recent
msg232v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Charleston, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Charleston, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mol. Biol. Evol. 21(1):45-57. 2004
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msg232
© 2004 by the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. ISSN: 0737-4038

A Cophylogenetic Perspective of RNA–Virus Evolution

Andrew P. Jackson and Michael A. Charleston

Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

E-mail: andrew.jackson{at}zoo.ox.ac.uk.

The extent to which viruses and their hosts codiverge remains an open question, given that numerous cases of both "cospeciation" and horizontal switching have recently been documented. DNA viruses that form persistent infections are thought to be the most likely candidates for phylogenetic congruence. Phylogenetic reconciliation analysis was used to compare established phylogenies for four RNA viruses and their hosts. The analysis employs a cophylogeny mapping technique, implemented in TreeMap v2.0, to find the most parsimonious combinations of evolutionary events able to reconcile any incongruence. This technique is guaranteed to recover all potentially optimal solutions to the reconciled tree and specifically tests the null hypothesis that an associate phylogeny is no more congruent with a host phylogeny than would be a random tree with the same taxon set. Phylogenies for Hantavirus, Spumavirus, and avian sarcoma leukosis virus were found to be significantly similar to their host trees, whereas Lyssavirus and Arenavirus displayed no significant congruence. These results demonstrate that RNA viruses are able to form stable associations with their hosts over evolutionary time scales and that the details of such associations are consistent with persistent infection being a necessary but not sufficient precondition.

Key Words: RNA–virus • phylogenetic reconciliation • cophylogeny • coevolution


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
C. Ramsden, F. L. Melo, Luiz. M. Figueiredo, E. C. Holmes, P. M.A. Zanotto, and the VGDN Consortium
High Rates of Molecular Evolution in Hantaviruses
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2008; 25(7): 1488 - 1492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Trop Med HygHome page
S. PATTAMADILOK, B.-H. LEE, S. KUMPERASART, K. YOSHIMATSU, M. OKUMURA, I. NAKAMURA, K. ARAKI, Y. KHOPRASERT, P. DANGSUPA, P. PANLAR, et al.
GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF HANTAVIRUSES IN THAILAND AND POTENTIAL HUMAN HEALTH SIGNIFICANCE OF THAILAND VIRUS
Am J Trop Med Hyg, November 1, 2006; 75(5): 994 - 1002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Virol.Home page
L. A. Shackelton, A. Rambaut, O. G. Pybus, and E. C. Holmes
JC Virus Evolution and Its Association with Human Populations.
J. Virol., October 1, 2006; 80(20): 9928 - 9933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Virol.Home page
M. Perez-Losada, R. G. Christensen, D. A. McClellan, B. J. Adams, R. P. Viscidi, J. C. Demma, and K. A. Crandall
Comparing Phylogenetic Codivergence between Polyomaviruses and Their Hosts.
J. Virol., June 1, 2006; 80(12): 5663 - 5669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.