Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MEIDNER, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MEIDNER, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by MEIDNER, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1970 Oxford University Press

RESEARCH-ARTICLE

Effects of Photoperiodic Induction and Debudding in Xanthium pennsylvanicum and of Partial Defoliation in Phaseolus vulgaris on Rates of Net Photosynthesis and Stomatal Conductances

HANS MEIDNER

Horticultural Research Laboratories, University of Reading Shinfield Grange, Reading

Xanthium pennsylvanicum plants received four treatments in the factorial experiment (a) debudded v. not debudded, and (b) long days {upsilon}. photoinductive short days. Rates of net photosynthesis, carbon dioxide compensation points ({Gamma}), and stomatal conductances were assessed after 8 days and before leaf growth or stomatal size were appreciably affected. Leaf size, stomatal frequencies, and lengths of guard cells were estimated at this time and again 22 flays after treatment.

Debudding alone slightly Increased stomatal conductance; induction alone had a similar but larger effect. Debudding and induction together caused a more than additive increase in net photosynthesis at 8 days, with marked decreases in {Gamma}. At 22 days this combination caused more than additive increases in leaf size and guard-cell lengths while stomatal frequencies had decreased.

Induction alone directly increased stomatal conductance and this may be responsible for the increase in photosynthesis; but debudding alone may directly affect photosynthesis by increasing the supply of cytokinins to the leaves. The positive interaction of these factors in photosynthesis could not be explained in terms of stomatal conductance and a synergism between cytokinins and a photoperiodically induced hormone is suggested.

In Phaseolus vulgaris plants, 4 days after partial defoliation, stomatal conductances and rates of net photosynthesis increased greatly in the remaining leaflets.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.