MBE Advance Access originally published online on February 7, 2003
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mol. Biol. Evol. 20(2):208-213. 2003
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msg024
© 2003 by the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. ISSN: 0737-4038
Gene Genealogies When the Sample Size Exceeds the Effective Size of the Population
Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
We study the properties of gene genealogies for large samples using a continuous approximation introduced by R. A. Fisher. We show that the major effect of large sample size, relative to the effective size of the population, is to increase the proportion of polymorphisms at which the mutant type is found in a single copy in the sample. We derive analytical expressions for the expected number of these singleton polymorphisms and for the total number of polymorphic, or segregating, sites that are valid even when the sample size is much greater than the effective size of the population. We use simulations to assess the accuracy of these predictions and to investigate other aspects of large-sample genealogies. Lastly, we apply our results to some data from Pacific oysters sampled from British Columbia. This illustrates that, when large samples are available, it is possible to estimate the mutation rate and the effective population size separately, in contrast to the case of small samples in which only the product of the mutation rate and the effective population size can be estimated.
Key Words: coalescent theory genealogies effective population size multiple mergers
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Wakeley and O. Sargsyan Extensions of the Coalescent Effective Population Size Genetics, January 1, 2009; 181(1): 341 - 345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.-M. Chevin, S. Billiard, and F. Hospital Hitchhiking Both Ways: Effect of Two Interfering Selective Sweeps on Linked Neutral Variation Genetics, September 1, 2008; 180(1): 301 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Eldon and J. Wakeley Coalescent Processes When the Distribution of Offspring Number Among Individuals Is Highly Skewed Genetics, April 1, 2006; 172(4): 2621 - 2633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Rauch and Y. Bar-Yam Estimating the total genetic diversity of a spatial field population from a sample and implications of its dependence on habitat area PNAS, July 12, 2005; 102(28): 9826 - 9829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wakeley The Limits of Theoretical Population Genetics Genetics, January 1, 2005; 169(1): 1 - 7. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Shriner, A. G. Rodrigo, D. C. Nickle, and J. I. Mullins Pervasive Genomic Recombination of HIV-1 in Vivo Genetics, August 1, 2004; 167(4): 1573 - 1583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

