Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on August 29, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/12/2067    most recent
msg220v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vershinin, A. V.
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, T. H. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vershinin, A. V.
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, T. H. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mol. Biol. Evol. 20(12):2067-2075. 2003
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msg220
© 2003 by the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. ISSN: 0737-4038

Transposable Elements Reveal the Impact of Introgression, Rather than Transposition, in Pisum Diversity, Evolution, and Domestication

Alexander V. Vershinin1, Theodore R. Allnutt, Maggie R. Knox, Mike J. Ambrose and T. H. Noel Ellis

Department of Crop Genetics, John Innes Centre, Norwich, United Kingdom

E-mail: alexander.vershinin{at}bbsrc.ac.uk.

The genetic structure and evolutionary history of the genus Pisum were studied exploiting our germplasm collection to compare the contribution of different mechanisms to the generation of diversity. We used sequence-specific amplification polymorphism (SSAP) markers to assess insertion site polymorphism generated by a representative of each of the two major groups of LTR-containing retrotransposons, PDR1 (Ty1/copia-like) and Cyclops (Ty3/gypsy-like), together with Pis1, a member of the En/Spm transposon superfamily. The analysis of extended sets of the four main Pisum species, P. fulvum, P. elatius, P. abyssinicum, and P. sativum, together with the reference set, revealed a distinct pattern of the NJ (Neighbor-Joining) tree for each basic lineage, which reflects the different evolutionary history of each species. The SSAP markers showed that Pisum is exceptionally polymorphic for an inbreeding species. The patterns of phylogenetic relationships deduced from different transposable elements were in general agreement. The retrotransposon-derived markers gave a clearer separation of the main lineages than the Pis1 markers and were able to distinguish the truly wild form of P. elatius from the antecedents of P. sativum. There were more species-specific and unique PDR1 markers than Pis1 markers in P. fulvum and P. elatius, pointing to PDR1 activity during speciation and diversification, but the proportion of these markers is low. The overall genetic diversity of Pisum and the extreme polymorphism in all species, except P. abyssinicum, indicate a high contribution of recombination between multiple ancestral lineages compared to transposition within lineages. The two independently domesticated pea species, P. abyssinicum and P. sativum, arose in contrasting ways from the common processes of hybridization, introgression, and selection without associated transpositional activity.

Key Words: transposable elements • Pisum evolution • molecular markers • recombination • domestication • retrotransposon activity


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
R. Jing, R. Johnson, A. Seres, G. Kiss, M. J. Ambrose, M. R. Knox, T. H. N. Ellis, and A. J. Flavell
Gene-Based Sequence Diversity Analysis of Field Pea (Pisum)
Genetics, December 1, 2007; 177(4): 2263 - 2275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
N. F. Weeden
Genetic Changes Accompanying the Domestication of Pisum sativum: Is there a Common Genetic Basis to the 'Domestication Syndrome' for Legumes?
Ann. Bot., October 1, 2007; 100(5): 1017 - 1025.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
R. Jing, M. R. Knox, J. M. Lee, A. V. Vershinin, M. Ambrose, T. H. N. Ellis, and A. J. Flavell
Insertional Polymorphism and Antiquity of PDR1 Retrotransposon Insertions in Pisum Species
Genetics, October 1, 2005; 171(2): 741 - 752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H.-K. Choi, J.-H. Mun, D.-J. Kim, H. Zhu, J.-M. Baek, J. Mudge, B. Roe, N. Ellis, J. Doyle, G. B. Kiss, et al.
Estimating genome conservation between crop and model legume species
PNAS, October 26, 2004; 101(43): 15289 - 15294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.