MBE Advance Access originally published online on June 27, 2003
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mol. Biol. Evol. 20(10):1710-1721. 2003
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msg190
© 2003 by the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. ISSN: 0737-4038
Patterns and Relative Rates of Nucleotide and Insertion/Deletion Evolution at Six Chloroplast Intergenic Regions in New World Species of the Lecythidaceae
,
* Department of Biology, Georgetown University
Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project, National Institute for Research in the Amazon, Manaus, Brazil
Department of Biology, Loyola University, Chicago
E-mail: hamiltm1{at}georgetown.edu.
Insertions and deletions (indels) in chloroplast noncoding regions are common genetic markers to estimate population structure and gene flow, although relatively little is known about indel evolution among recently diverged lineages such as within plant families. Because indel events tend to occur nonrandomly along DNA sequences, recurrent mutations may generate homoplasy for indel haplotypes. This is a potential problem for population studies, because indel haplotypes may be shared among populations after recurrent mutation as well as gene flow. Furthermore, indel haplotypes may differ in fitness and therefore be subject to natural selection detectable as rate heterogeneity among lineages. Such selection could contribute to the spatial patterning of cpDNA haplotypes, greatly complicating the interpretation of cpDNA population structure. This study examined both nucleotide and indel cpDNA variation and divergence at six noncoding regions (psbB-psbH, atpB-rbcL, trnL-trnH, rpl20-5'rps12, trnS-trnG, and trnH-psbA) in 16 individuals from eight species in the Lecythidaceae and a Sapotaceae outgroup. We described patterns of cpDNA changes, assessed the level of indel homoplasy, and tested for rate heterogeneity among lineages and regions. Although regression analysis of branch lengths suggested some degree of indel homoplasy among the most divergent lineages, there was little evidence for indel homoplasy within the Lecythidaceae. Likelihood ratio tests applied to the entire phylogenetic tree revealed a consistent pattern rejecting a molecular clock. Tajima's 1D and 2D tests revealed two taxa with consistent rate heterogeneity, one showing relatively more and one relatively fewer changes than other taxa. In general, nucleotide changes showed more evidence of rate heterogeneity than did indel changes. The rate of evolution was highly variable among the six cpDNA regions examined, with the trnS-trnG and trnH-psbA regions showing as much as 10% and 15% divergence within the Lecythidaceae. Deviations from rate homogeneity in the two taxa were constant across cpDNA regions, consistent with lineage-specific rates of evolution rather than cpDNA region-specific natural selection. There is no evidence that indels are more likely than nucleotide changes to experience homoplasy within the Lecythidaceae. These results support a neutral interpretation of cpDNA indel and nucleotide variation in population studies within species such as Corythophora alta.
Key Words: homoplasy chloroplast genome indel intergenic relative rate generation time effect
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Font, N. Garcia-Jacas, R. Vilatersana, C. Roquet, and A. Susanna Evolution and biogeography of Centaurea section Acrocentron inferred from nuclear and plastid DNA sequence analyses Ann. Bot., April 1, 2009; 103(6): 985 - 997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. F. Soria-Hernanz, J. M. Braverman, and M. B. Hamilton Parallel Rate Heterogeneity in Chloroplast and Mitochondrial Genomes of Brazil Nut Trees (Lecythidaceae) Is Consistent with Lineage Effects Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2008; 25(7): 1282 - 1296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Brandstrom and H. Ellegren The Genomic Landscape of Short Insertion and Deletion Polymorphisms in the Chicken (Gallus gallus) Genome: A High Frequency of Deletions in Tandem Duplicates Genetics, July 1, 2007; 176(3): 1691 - 1701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. McKenzie, E. M. Muller, A. K. W. Skinner, P. O. Karis, and N. P. Barker Phylogenetic relationships and generic delimitation in subtribe Arctotidinae (Asteraceae: Arctotideae) inferred by DNA sequence data from ITS and five chloroplast regions Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2006; 93(8): 1222 - 1235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yamane, K. Yano, and T. Kawahara Pattern and Rate of Indel Evolution Inferred from Whole Chloroplast Intergenic Regions in Sugarcane, Maize and Rice DNA Res, January 1, 2006; 13(5): 197 - 204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. Kress, K. J. Wurdack, E. A. Zimmer, L. A. Weigt, and D. H. Janzen Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants PNAS, June 7, 2005; 102(23): 8369 - 8374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Koch, C. Dobes, M. Matschinger, W. Bleeker, J. Vogel, M. Kiefer, and T. Mitchell-Olds Evolution of the trnF(GAA) Gene in Arabidopsis Relatives and the Brassicaceae Family: Monophyletic Origin and Subsequent Diversification of a Plastidic Pseudogene Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2005; 22(4): 1032 - 1043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Shaw, E. B. Lickey, J. T. Beck, S. B. Farmer, W. Liu, J. Miller, K. C. Siripun, C. T. Winder, E. E. Schilling, and R. L. Small The tortoise and the hare II: relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2005; 92(1): 142 - 166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Sanderson, J. L. Thorne, N. Wikstrom, and K. Bremer Molecular evidence on plant divergence times Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2004; 91(10): 1656 - 1665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





