Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on June 27, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/10/1710    most recent
msg190v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (27)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Soria-Hernanz, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Soria-Hernanz, D. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mol. Biol. Evol. 20(10):1710-1721. 2003
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msg190
© 2003 by the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. ISSN: 0737-4038

Patterns and Relative Rates of Nucleotide and Insertion/Deletion Evolution at Six Chloroplast Intergenic Regions in New World Species of the Lecythidaceae

Matthew B. Hamilton*,{dagger},, John M. Braverman{ddagger} and David F. Soria-Hernanz*

* Department of Biology, Georgetown University
{dagger} Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project, National Institute for Research in the Amazon, Manaus, Brazil
{ddagger} Department of Biology, Loyola University, Chicago

E-mail: hamiltm1{at}georgetown.edu.

Insertions and deletions (indels) in chloroplast noncoding regions are common genetic markers to estimate population structure and gene flow, although relatively little is known about indel evolution among recently diverged lineages such as within plant families. Because indel events tend to occur nonrandomly along DNA sequences, recurrent mutations may generate homoplasy for indel haplotypes. This is a potential problem for population studies, because indel haplotypes may be shared among populations after recurrent mutation as well as gene flow. Furthermore, indel haplotypes may differ in fitness and therefore be subject to natural selection detectable as rate heterogeneity among lineages. Such selection could contribute to the spatial patterning of cpDNA haplotypes, greatly complicating the interpretation of cpDNA population structure. This study examined both nucleotide and indel cpDNA variation and divergence at six noncoding regions (psbB-psbH, atpB-rbcL, trnL-trnH, rpl20-5'rps12, trnS-trnG, and trnH-psbA) in 16 individuals from eight species in the Lecythidaceae and a Sapotaceae outgroup. We described patterns of cpDNA changes, assessed the level of indel homoplasy, and tested for rate heterogeneity among lineages and regions. Although regression analysis of branch lengths suggested some degree of indel homoplasy among the most divergent lineages, there was little evidence for indel homoplasy within the Lecythidaceae. Likelihood ratio tests applied to the entire phylogenetic tree revealed a consistent pattern rejecting a molecular clock. Tajima's 1D and 2D tests revealed two taxa with consistent rate heterogeneity, one showing relatively more and one relatively fewer changes than other taxa. In general, nucleotide changes showed more evidence of rate heterogeneity than did indel changes. The rate of evolution was highly variable among the six cpDNA regions examined, with the trnS-trnG and trnH-psbA regions showing as much as 10% and 15% divergence within the Lecythidaceae. Deviations from rate homogeneity in the two taxa were constant across cpDNA regions, consistent with lineage-specific rates of evolution rather than cpDNA region-specific natural selection. There is no evidence that indels are more likely than nucleotide changes to experience homoplasy within the Lecythidaceae. These results support a neutral interpretation of cpDNA indel and nucleotide variation in population studies within species such as Corythophora alta.

Key Words: homoplasy • chloroplast genome • indel • intergenic • relative rate • generation time effect


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. Font, N. Garcia-Jacas, R. Vilatersana, C. Roquet, and A. Susanna
Evolution and biogeography of Centaurea section Acrocentron inferred from nuclear and plastid DNA sequence analyses
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2009; 103(6): 985 - 997.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
D. F. Soria-Hernanz, J. M. Braverman, and M. B. Hamilton
Parallel Rate Heterogeneity in Chloroplast and Mitochondrial Genomes of Brazil Nut Trees (Lecythidaceae) Is Consistent with Lineage Effects
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2008; 25(7): 1282 - 1296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. Brandstrom and H. Ellegren
The Genomic Landscape of Short Insertion and Deletion Polymorphisms in the Chicken (Gallus gallus) Genome: A High Frequency of Deletions in Tandem Duplicates
Genetics, July 1, 2007; 176(3): 1691 - 1701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
R. J. McKenzie, E. M. Muller, A. K. W. Skinner, P. O. Karis, and N. P. Barker
Phylogenetic relationships and generic delimitation in subtribe Arctotidinae (Asteraceae: Arctotideae) inferred by DNA sequence data from ITS and five chloroplast regions
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2006; 93(8): 1222 - 1235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DNA ResHome page
K. Yamane, K. Yano, and T. Kawahara
Pattern and Rate of Indel Evolution Inferred from Whole Chloroplast Intergenic Regions in Sugarcane, Maize and Rice
DNA Res, January 1, 2006; 13(5): 197 - 204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
W. J. Kress, K. J. Wurdack, E. A. Zimmer, L. A. Weigt, and D. H. Janzen
Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants
PNAS, June 7, 2005; 102(23): 8369 - 8374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. A. Koch, C. Dobes, M. Matschinger, W. Bleeker, J. Vogel, M. Kiefer, and T. Mitchell-Olds
Evolution of the trnF(GAA) Gene in Arabidopsis Relatives and the Brassicaceae Family: Monophyletic Origin and Subsequent Diversification of a Plastidic Pseudogene
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2005; 22(4): 1032 - 1043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. Shaw, E. B. Lickey, J. T. Beck, S. B. Farmer, W. Liu, J. Miller, K. C. Siripun, C. T. Winder, E. E. Schilling, and R. L. Small
The tortoise and the hare II: relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis
Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2005; 92(1): 142 - 166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
M. J. Sanderson, J. L. Thorne, N. Wikstrom, and K. Bremer
Molecular evidence on plant divergence times
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2004; 91(10): 1656 - 1665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.