Skip Navigation


MBE Advance Access originally published online on July 28, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/10/1633    most recent
msg178v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malcom, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lahn, B. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Malcom, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lahn, B. T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mol. Biol. Evol. 20(10):1633-1641. 2003
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msg178
© 2003 by the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. ISSN: 0737-4038

Genic Mutation Rates in Mammals: Local Similarity, Chromosomal Heterogeneity, and X-Versus-Autosome Disparity

Christine M. Malcom*,{dagger}, Gerald J. Wyckoff*,1, and Bruce T. Lahn*

* Department of Human Genetics
{dagger} Department of Anthropology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Chicago

E-mail: wyckoffg{at}umkc.edu.

The reduction of mutation rates on the mammalian X chromosome relative to autosomes is most often explained in the literature as evidence of male-driven evolution. This hypothesis attributes lowered mutation rates on the X chromosome to the fact that this chromosome spends less time in the germline of males than in the germline of females. In contrast to this majority view, two articles argued that the patterns of mutation rates across chromosomes are inconsistent with male-driven evolution. One article reported a 40% reduction in synonymous substitution rates (Ks) for X-linked genes relative to autosomes in the mouse-rat lineage. The authors argued that this reduction is too dramatic to be explained by male-driven evolution and concluded that selection has systematically reduced mutation rate on the X chromosome to a level optimal for this male-hemizygous chromosome. More recently, a second article found that chromosomal mutation rates in both the human-mouse and mouse-rat lineages were so heterogeneous that the X chromosome was not an outlier. Here again, the authors argued that this is at odds with male-driven evolution and suggested that selection has modulated chromosomal mutation rates to locally optimal levels, thus extending the argument of the first mentioned article to include autosomes. Here, we reexamine these conclusions using mouse-rat and human-mouse coding-region data. We find a more modest reduction of Ks on the X chromosome, but our results contradict the finding that the X chromosome is not distinct from autosomes. Multiple statistical tests show that Ks rates on the X chromosome differ systematically from the autosomes in both lineages. We conclude that the moderate reduction of mutation rate on the X chromosome of both lineages is consistent with male-driven evolution; however, the large variance in mutation rates across chromosomes suggests that mutation rates are affected by additional factors besides male-driven evolution. Investigation of mutation rates by synteny reveals that synteny blocks, rather than entire chromosomes, might represent the unit of mutation rate variation.

Key Words: comparative genomics • male-driven evolution • mutation rate • molecular evolution • sex chromosomes • synteny bins


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Genome ResHome page
J.-C. Walser, L. Ponger, and A. V. Furano
CpG dinucleotides and the mutation rate of non-CpG DNA
Genome Res., September 1, 2008; 18(9): 1403 - 1414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
J. F. Baines and B. Harr
Reduced X-Linked Diversity in Derived Populations of House Mice
Genetics, April 1, 2007; 175(4): 1911 - 1921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BioinformaticsHome page
E. J. Vallender, J. E. Paschall, C. M. Malcom, B. T. Lahn, and G. J. Wyckoff
SPEED: a molecular-evolution-based database of mammalian orthologous groups
Bioinformatics, November 15, 2006; 22(22): 2835 - 2837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
B.-Y. Liao, N. M. Scott, and J. Zhang
Impacts of Gene Essentiality, Expression Pattern, and Gene Compactness on the Evolutionary Rate of Mammalian Proteins
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2006; 23(11): 2072 - 2080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ScienceHome page
M. C. Popesco, E. J. MacLaren, J. Hopkins, L. Dumas, M. Cox, L. Meltesen, L. McGavran, G. J. Wyckoff, and J. M. Sikela
Human Lineage-Specific Amplification, Selection, and Neuronal Expression of DUF1220 Domains.
Science, September 1, 2006; 313(5791): 1304 - 1307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Genome ResHome page
M. Ohno, T. Miura, M. Furuichi, Y. Tominaga, D. Tsuchimoto, K. Sakumi, and Y. Nakabeppu
A genome-wide distribution of 8-oxoguanine correlates with the preferred regions for recombination and single nucleotide polymorphism in the human genome.
Genome Res., May 1, 2006; 16(5): 567 - 575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Genome ResHome page
K. Thornton, D. Bachtrog, and P. Andolfatto
X chromosomes and autosomes evolve at similar rates in Drosophila: No evidence for faster-X protein evolution
Genome Res., April 1, 2006; 16(4): 498 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. Taylor, S. Tyekucheva, M. Zody, F. Chiaromonte, and K. D. Makova
Strong and Weak Male Mutation Bias at Different Sites in the Primate Genomes: Insights from the Human-Chimpanzee Comparison
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2006; 23(3): 565 - 573.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Genome ResHome page
I. Hellmann, K. Prufer, H. Ji, M. C. Zody, S. Paabo, and S. E. Ptak
Why do human diversity levels vary at a megabase scale?
Genome Res., September 1, 2005; 15(9): 1222 - 1231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Genome ResHome page
D. J. Gaffney and P. D. Keightley
The scale of mutational variation in the murid genome
Genome Res., August 1, 2005; 15(8): 1086 - 1094.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. T. Webster, N. G.C. Smith, M. J. Lercher, and H. Ellegren
Gene Expression, Synteny, and Local Similarity in Human Noncoding Mutation Rates
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2004; 21(10): 1820 - 1830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
E. Axelsson, N. G.C. Smith, H. Sundstrom, S. Berlin, and H. Ellegren
Male-Biased Mutation Rate and Divergence in Autosomal, Z-Linked and W-Linked Introns of Chicken and Turkey
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2004; 21(8): 1538 - 1547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Genome ResHome page
M. J. Lercher, J.-V. Chamary, and L. D. Hurst
Genomic Regionality in Rates of Evolution Is Not Explained by Clustering of Genes of Comparable Expression Profile
Genome Res., June 1, 2004; 14(6): 1002 - 1013.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
L. A. Sheldahl, D. M. Weinreich, and D. M. Rand
Recombination, Dominance and Selection on Amino Acid Polymorphism in the Drosophila Genome: Contrasting Patterns on the X and Fourth Chromosomes
Genetics, November 1, 2003; 165(3): 1195 - 1208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.