Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beck, N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cockburn, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beck, N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cockburn, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mol. Biol. Evol. 20(1):54-61. 2003
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msg005
© 2003 by the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. ISSN: 0737-4038

Microsatellite Evolution at Two Hypervariable Loci Revealed by Extensive Avian Pedigrees

Nadeena R. Beck, Michael C. Double and Andrew Cockburn

Evolutionary Ecology Group, School of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia

Genealogies generated through a long-term study of superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus) were used to investigate mutation within two hypervariable microsatellite loci. Of 3,230 meioses examined at the tetranucleotide locus (Mcyµ8), 45 mutations were identified, giving a mutation rate of 1.4%. At the dinucleotide locus (Mcyµ4) 30 mutations were recorded from 2,750 meioses giving a mutation rate of 1.1%. Mutations at both loci primarily (80%; 60/75) involved the loss or gain of a single repeat unit. Unlike previous studies, there was no significant bias toward additions over deletions. The mutation rate at Mcyµ8 increased with allele size, and very long alleles (>70 repeats) mutated at a rate of almost 20%. The length of the mutating allele and allele span, however, were strongly correlated so it was not possible to isolate the causative factor. Allele size did not appear to affect mutation rate at Mcyµ4, but the repeat number was considerably lower at this locus. The gender of the mutating parent was significant only at Mcyµ8, where mutations occurred more frequently in maternal alleles. However, at both loci we found that alleles inherited from the mother were on average larger than those from the father, and this in part drove the higher mutation rate among maternally inherited alleles at Mcyµ8.

Key Words: microsatellites • Malurus cyaneus • mutation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A.-L. Raquin, F. Depaulis, A. Lambert, N. Galic, P. Brabant, and I. Goldringer
Experimental Estimation of Mutation Rates in a Wheat Population With a Gene Genealogy Approach
Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 2195 - 2211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. L. Seyfert, M. E. A. Cristescu, L. Frisse, S. Schaack, W. K. Thomas, and M. Lynch
The Rate and Spectrum of Microsatellite Mutation in Caenorhabditis elegans and Daphnia pulex
Genetics, April 1, 2008; 178(4): 2113 - 2121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
O. Paun and E. Horandl
Evolution of Hypervariable Microsatellites in Apomictic Polyploid Lineages of Ranunculus carpaticola: Directional Bias at Dinucleotide Loci
Genetics, September 1, 2006; 174(1): 387 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. Brohede, N. Arnheim, and H. Ellegren
Single-Molecule Analysis of the Hypermutable Tetranucleotide Repeat Locus D21S1245 Through Sperm Genotyping: A Heterogeneous Pattern of Mutation but no Clear Male Age Effect
Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2004; 21(1): 58 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.