Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (38)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hughes, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hughes, A. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Mol. Biol. Evol. 20(1):154-161. 2003
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msg017
© 2003 by the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. ISSN: 0737-4038

The Temporal Distribution of Gene Duplication Events in a Set of Highly Conserved Human Gene Families

Robert Friedman1 and Austin L. Hughes

Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina

Using a data set of protein translations associated with map positions in the human genome, we identified 1520 mapped highly conserved gene families. By comparing sharing of families between genomic windows, we identified 92 potentially duplicated blocks in the human genome containing 422 duplicated members of these families. Using branching order in the phylogenetic trees, we timed gene duplication events in these families relative to the primate-rodent divergence, the amniote-amphibian divergence, and the deuterostome-protostome divergence. The results showed similar patterns of gene duplication times within duplicated blocks and outside duplicated blocks. Both within and outside duplicated blocks, numerous duplications were timed prior to the deuterostome-protostome divergence, whereas others occurred after the amniote-amphibian divergence. Thus, neither gene duplication in general nor duplication of genomic blocks could be attributed entirely to polyploidization early in vertebrate history. The strongest signal in the data was a tendency for intrachromosomal duplications to be more recent than interchromosomal duplications, consistent with a model whereby tandem duplication—whether of single genes or of genomic blocks—may be followed by eventual separation of duplicates due to chromosomal rearrangements. The rate of separation of tandemly duplicated gene pairs onto separated chromosomes in the human lineage was estimated at 1.7 x 10-9 per gene-pair per year.

Key Words: block duplication • genome evolution • polyploidization • tandem duplication • vertebrate evolution


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
V. Ravi, K. Lam, B.-H. Tay, A. Tay, S. Brenner, and B. Venkatesh
Elephant shark (Callorhinchus milii) provides insights into the evolution of Hox gene clusters in gnathostomes
PNAS, September 22, 2009; 106(38): 16327 - 16332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
Q. Zhou, G. Zhang, Y. Zhang, S. Xu, R. Zhao, Z. Zhan, X. Li, Y. Ding, S. Yang, and W. Wang
On the origin of new genes in Drosophila
Genome Res., September 1, 2008; 18(9): 1446 - 1455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
W. Wang, J. Zhong, B. Su, Y. Zhou, and Y.-Q. Wang
Comparison of Pax1/9 Locus Reveals 500-Myr-Old Syntenic Block and Evolutionary Conserved Noncoding Regions
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2007; 24(3): 784 - 791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
V. Shoja and L. Zhang
A Roadmap of Tandemly Arrayed Genes in the Genomes of Human, Mouse, and Rat
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2006; 23(11): 2134 - 2141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
K. M. Viiri, H. Korkeamaki, M. K. Kukkonen, L. K. Nieminen, K. Lindfors, P. Peterson, M. Maki, H. Kainulainen, and O. Lohi
SAP30L interacts with members of the Sin3A corepressor complex and targets Sin3A to the nucleolus
Nucleic Acids Res., July 4, 2006; 34(11): 3288 - 3298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. L. Mueller, K. R. Ram, L. A. McGraw, M. C. Bloch Qazi, E. D. Siggia, A. G. Clark, C. F. Aquadro, and M. F. Wolfner
Cross-Species Comparison of Drosophila Male Accessory Gland Protein Genes
Genetics, September 1, 2005; 171(1): 131 - 143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
K. S. Makarova, Y. I. Wolf, S. L. Mekhedov, B. G. Mirkin, and E. V. Koonin
Ancestral paralogs and pseudoparalogs and their role in the emergence of the eukaryotic cell
Nucleic Acids Res., August 16, 2005; 33(14): 4626 - 4638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. Fukami-Kobayashi, T. Shiina, T. Anzai, K. Sano, M. Yamazaki, H. Inoko, and Y. Tateno
Genomic evolution of MHC class I region in primates
PNAS, June 28, 2005; 102(26): 9230 - 9234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
W. Hao and G. B. Golding
Patterns of Bacterial Gene Movement
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2004; 21(7): 1294 - 1307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
R. Friedman and A. L. Hughes
Two Patterns of Genome Organization in Mammals: the Chromosomal Distribution of Duplicate Genes in Human and Mouse
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2004; 21(6): 1008 - 1013.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. Robinson-Rechavi, B. Boussau, and V. Laudet
Phylogenetic Dating and Characterization of Gene Duplications in Vertebrates: The Cartilaginous Fish Reference
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2004; 21(3): 580 - 586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. Vandepoele, W. De Vos, J. S. Taylor, A. Meyer, and Y. Van de Peer
Major events in the genome evolution of vertebrates: Paranome age and size differ considerably between ray-finned fishes and land vertebrates
PNAS, February 10, 2004; 101(6): 1638 - 1643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
B. Cardazzo, L. Bargelloni, L. Toffolatti, and T. Patarnello
Intervening Sequences in Paralogous Genes: A Comparative Genomic Approach to Study the Evolution of X Chromosome Introns
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2003; 20(12): 2034 - 2041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
N. M. A. El-Sayed, E. Ghedin, J. Song, A. MacLeod, F. Bringaud, C. Larkin, D. Wanless, J. Peterson, L. Hou, S. Taylor, et al.
The sequence and analysis of Trypanosoma brucei chromosome II
Nucleic Acids Res., August 15, 2003; 31(16): 4856 - 4863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
E. E. Eichler and D. Sankoff
Structural Dynamics of Eukaryotic Chromosome Evolution
Science, August 8, 2003; 301(5634): 793 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant BiolHome page
A.T. HAMILTON, S. HUNTLEY, J. KIM, E. BRANSCOMB, and L. STUBBS
Lineage-specific Expansion of KRAB Zinc-finger Transcription Factor Genes: Implications for the Evolution of Vertebrate Regulatory Networks
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 2003; 68(0): 131 - 140.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.