Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levinson, G.
Right arrow Articles by Gutman, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levinson, G.
Right arrow Articles by Gutman, G. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 2, 494-504, Copyright © 1985 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Cross-hybridizing snake satellite, Drosophila, and mouse DNA sequences may have arisen independently

G Levinson, JL Marsh, JT Epplen and GA Gutman
Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Irvine 92717.

Previous reports have interpreted hybridization between snake satellite DNA and DNA clones from a variety of distant taxonomic groups as evidence for evolutionary conservation, which implies common ancestry (homology) and/or convergence (analogy) to produce the cross- hybridizing sequences. We have isolated 11 clones from a genomic library of Drosophila melanogaster, using a cloned 2.5-kb snake satellite probe of known nucleotide sequence. We have also analysed published sequence data from snakes, mice, and Drosophila. These data show that (1) all of the cross-hybridization between the snake, fly, and mouse clones can be accounted for by the presence of either of two tandem repeats, [GATA]n and [GACA]n and (2) these tandem repeats are organized differently among the different species. We find no evidence that these sequences are homologous apart from the existence of the simple repeat itself, although their divergence from a common ancestral sequence cannot be ruled out. The sequences contain a variety of homogeneous clusters of tandem repeats of CATA, GA, TA, and CA, as well as GATA and GACA. We suggest that these motifs may have arisen by a self-accelerating process involving slipped-strand mispairing of DNA. Homogeneity of the clusters might simply be the result of a rate of accumulation of tandem repeats that exceeds that of other mutations.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.