Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (40)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keith, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Rigby, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keith, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Rigby, D. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 2, 206-216, Copyright © 1985 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Nearly identical allelic distributions of xanthine dehydrogenase in two populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura

TP Keith, LD Brooks, RC Lewontin, JC Martinez-Cruzado and DL Rigby
Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138.

In a previous study, Keith (1983) showed by sequential gel electrophoresis of the esterase-5 protein in Drosophila pseudoobscura that a highly polymorphic locus with many alleles can have very similar frequency distributions in populations separated by 500 km. The present work studies another highly polymorphic locus, xanthine dehydrogenase, in the same California population samples, using the same technique to distinguish allelic classes. Twelve electromorphs were found in one population and 15 in the other. Both populations shared a single very frequent (approximately 60%) allele, as well as five other alleles in low but similar frequencies. In addition, each population had an array of unique alleles present only once in one population sample but absent in the other. A statistical test against the stationary distribution for neutral alleles shows that, if the populations are at equilibrium, then purifying selection is operating on xanthine dehydrogenase. The extremely close similarity in frequency distributions of the alleles between populations for both the xanthine dehydrogenase and esterase-5 loci, despite differences in allele frequency distribution between loci, strongly emphasizes the importance of migration in influencing genic diversity in these populations.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. V. Trotter and H. G. Spencer
Frequency-Dependent Selection and the Maintenance of Genetic Variation: Exploring the Parameter Space of the Multiallelic Pairwise Interaction Model
Genetics, July 1, 2007; 176(3): 1729 - 1740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
R. Piccinali, M. Aguade, and E. Hasson
Comparative Molecular Population Genetics of the Xdh Locus in the Cactophilic Sibling Species Drosophila buzzatii and D. koepferae
Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2004; 21(1): 141 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
P. Donnelly, M. Nordborg, and P. Joyce
Likelihoods and Simulation Methods for a Class of Nonneutral Population Genetics Models
Genetics, October 1, 2001; 159(2): 853 - 867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. Kovacevic and S. W. Schaeffer
Molecular Population Genetics of X-Linked Genes in Drosophila pseudoobscura
Genetics, September 1, 2000; 156(1): 155 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. M. Wright, D. A. Clayton, M. G. Riley, J. L. McManaman, and J. E. Repine
cDNA Cloning, Sequencing, and Characterization of Male and Female Rat Liver Aldehyde Oxidase (rAOX1). DIFFERENCES IN REDOX STATUS MAY DISTINGUISH MALE AND FEMALE FORMS OF HEPATIC AOX
J. Biol. Chem., February 5, 1999; 274(6): 3878 - 3886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.