Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 2, 127-140, Copyright © 1985 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution
SL Martin, CF Voliva, SC Hardies, MH Edgell and CA Hutchison 3d
A 300-bp DNA sequence has been determined for 30 (10 from each of three
species of mice) random isolates of a subset of the long interspersed
repeat family L1. From these data we conclude that members of the L1 family
are evolving in concert at the DNA sequence level in Mus domesticus, Mus
caroli, and Mus platythrix. The mechanism responsible for this phenomenon
may be either duplicative transposition, gene conversion, or a combination
of the two. The amount of intraspecies divergence averages 4.4%, although
between species base substitutions accumulate at the rate of approximately
0.85%/Myr to a maximum divergence of 9.1% between M. platythrix and both M.
domesticus and M. caroli. Parsimony analysis reveals that the M. platythrix
L1 family has evolved into a distinct clade in the 10-12 Myr since M.
platythrix last shared a common ancestor with M. domesticus and M. caroli.
The parsimony tree also provides a means to derive the average half-life of
L1 sequences in the genome. The rates of gain and loss of individual copies
of L1 were estimated to be approximately equal, such that approximately
one-half of them turn over every 3.3 Myr.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Tempo and mode of concerted evolution in the L1 repeat family of mice
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27514.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. Ichiyanagi, H. Nishihara, D. D. Duvernell, and N. Okada Acquisition of Endonuclease Specificity during Evolution of L1 Retrotransposon Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2007; 24(9): 2009 - 2015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Elez, M. Radman, and I. Matic The frequency and structure of recombinant products is determined by the cellular level of MutL PNAS, May 22, 2007; 104(21): 8935 - 8940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Khan, A. Smit, and S. Boissinot Molecular evolution and tempo of amplification of human LINE-1 retrotransposons since the origin of primates Genome Res., January 1, 2006; 16(1): 78 - 87. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. Wei, N. Gilbert, S. L. Ooi, J. F. Lawler, E. M. Ostertag, H. H. Kazazian, J. D. Boeke, and J. V. Moran Human L1 Retrotransposition: cis Preference versus trans Complementation Mol. Cell. Biol., February 15, 2001; 21(4): 1429 - 1439. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. C. Casavant, L. Scott, M. A. Cantrell, L. E. Wiggins, R. J. Baker, and H. A. Wichman The End of the LINE?: Lack of Recent L1 Activity in a Group of South American Rodents Genetics, April 1, 2000; 154(4): 1809 - 1817. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. C. Hardies, L. Wang, L. Zhou, Y. Zhao, N. C. Casavant, and S. Huang LINE-1 (L1) Lineages in the Mouse Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2000; 17(4): 616 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Tremblay, M. Jasin, and P. Chartrand A Double-Strand Break in a Chromosomal LINE Element Can Be Repaired by Gene Conversion with Various Endogenous LINE Elements in Mouse Cells Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2000; 20(1): 54 - 60. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. V. Furano and K. Usdin DNA ``Fossils'' and Phylogenetic Analysis J. Biol. Chem., October 27, 1995; 270(43): 25301 - 25304. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|