Molecular Biology and Evolution 19:1376-1384 (2002)
© 2002 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution
The Genealogy of a Sequence Subject to Purifying Selection at Multiple Sites
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence
We investigate the effect of purifying selection at multiple sites on both the shape of the genealogy and the distribution of mutations on the tree. We find that the primary effect of purifying selection on a genealogy is to shift the distribution of mutations on the tree, whereas the shape of the tree remains largely unchanged. This result is relevant to the large number of coalescent estimation procedures, which generally assume neutrality for segregating polymorphisms—applying these estimators to evolutionarily constrained sequences could lead to a significant degree of bias. We also estimate the statistical power of several neutrality tests in detecting weak to moderate purifying selection and find that the power is quite good for some parameter combinations. This result contrasts with previous studies, which predicted low statistical power because of the minor effect that weak purifying selection has on the shape of a genealogy. Finally, we investigate the effect of Hill-Robertson interference among linked deleterious mutations on patterns of molecular variation. We find that dependence among selected loci can substantially reduce the efficacy of even fairly strong purifying selection.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. Charlesworth, A.J. Betancourt, V.B. Kaiser, and I. Gordo Genetic Recombination and Molecular Evolution Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, September 4, 2009; (2009) sqb.2009.74.015v1. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. E. Taylor The Genealogical Consequences of Fecundity Variance Polymorphism Genetics, July 1, 2009; 182(3): 813 - 837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. Zhai, R. Nielsen, and M. Slatkin An Investigation of the Statistical Power of Neutrality Tests Based on Comparative and Population Genetic Data Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2009; 26(2): 273 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. D. Hernandez, S. H. Williamson, and C. D. Bustamante Context Dependence, Ancestral Misidentification, and Spurious Signatures of Natural Selection Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2007; 24(8): 1792 - 1800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Y. W. Ho, B. Shapiro, M. J. Phillips, A. Cooper, and A. J. Drummond Evidence for Time Dependency of Molecular Rate Estimates Syst Biol, June 1, 2007; 56(3): 515 - 522. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. T. T. Edwards, E. C. Holmes, O. G. Pybus, D. J. Wilson, R. P. Viscidi, E. J. Abrams, R. E. Phillips, and A. J. Drummond Evolution of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Envelope Gene Is Dominated by Purifying Selection Genetics, November 1, 2006; 174(3): 1441 - 1453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Ronald, H. Tang, and R. B. Brem Genomewide Evolutionary Rates in Laboratory and Wild Yeast Genetics, September 1, 2006; 174(1): 541 - 544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. A. Reed, J. M. Akey, and C. F. Aquadro Fitting background-selection predictions to levels of nucleotide variation and divergence along the human autosomes Genome Res., September 1, 2005; 15(9): 1211 - 1221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. H. Barton and A. M. Etheridge The Effect of Selection on Genealogies Genetics, February 1, 2004; 166(2): 1115 - 1131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. H. Ardell, C. A. Lozupone, and L. F. Landweber Polymorphism, Recombination and Alternative Unscrambling in the DNA Polymerase {alpha} Gene of the Ciliate Stylonychia lemnae (Alveolata; class Spirotrichea) Genetics, December 1, 2003; 165(4): 1761 - 1777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Anisimova, R. Nielsen, and Z. Yang Effect of Recombination on the Accuracy of the Likelihood Method for Detecting Positive Selection at Amino Acid Sites Genetics, July 1, 2003; 164(3): 1229 - 1236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|