Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leebens-Mack, J.
Right arrow Articles by dePamphilis, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leebens-Mack, J.
Right arrow Articles by dePamphilis, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution 19:1292-1302 (2002)
© 2002 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution

Power Analysis of Tests for Loss of Selective Constraint in Cave Crayfish and Nonphotosynthetic Plant Lineages

Jim Leebens-Mack*{dagger} and Claude dePamphilis{dagger}

*Department of Biology, Colgate University, New York;
{dagger}Department of Biology and Institute of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics, Penn State University

Loss of selective constraint on a gene may be expected following changes in the environment or life history that render its function unnecessary. The long-term persistence of protein-coding genes after the loss of known functional necessity can occur by chance or because of selective maintenance of an unknown gene function. The selective maintenance of an alternative gene function is not demonstrated by the failure of statistical tests to reject the hypothesis that there has been no change in the degree of constraint on the evolution of coding genes. Maintenance may be inferred, however, when power analyses of such tests demonstrate that there has been a sufficient number of nucleotide substitutions to detect the loss of selective constraint. Here, we describe a power analysis for tests of loss of constraint on protein-coding genes. The power analysis was applied to loss-of-constraint tests for opsin gene evolution in cave-dwelling crayfish and rbcL evolution in nonphotosynthetic parasitic plants. The power of previously applied tests for loss of constraint on cave crayfish opsin genes was insufficient to distinguish between chance retention and selective maintenance of opsin genes. However, the power of codon-based likelihood ratio tests for change in dN/dS (={omega}) (nonsynonymous to synonymous change) did have sufficient power to detect a loss of constraint on rbcL associated with a loss of photosynthesis in most examples but failed to detect such a change in three independent lineages. We conclude that rbcL has been selectively maintained in these holoparasitic plant lineages. This conclusion suggests that either these taxa are photosynthetic for at least a part of their life or rbcL may have an unknown function in these plants unrelated to photosynthesis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Bot.Home page
C. P. Randle and A. D. Wolfe
The evolution and expression of RBCL in holoparasitic sister-genera Harveya and Hyobanche (Orobanchaceae)
Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2005; 92(9): 1575 - 1585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. J. Barkman, S.-H. Lim, K. M. Salleh, and J. Nais
From the Cover: Mitochondrial DNA sequences reveal the photosynthetic relatives of Rafflesia, the world's largest flower
PNAS, January 20, 2004; 101(3): 787 - 792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.