Molecular Biology and Evolution 19:1171-1180 (2002)
© 2002 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution
Bayesian Model Adequacy and Choice in Phylogenetics
Department of Biology, University of Rochester
Bayesian inference is becoming a common statistical approach to phylogenetic estimation because, among other reasons, it allows for rapid analysis of large data sets with complex evolutionary models. Conveniently, Bayesian phylogenetic methods use currently available stochastic models of sequence evolution. However, as with other model-based approaches, the results of Bayesian inference are conditional on the assumed model of evolution: inadequate models (models that poorly fit the data) may result in erroneous inferences. In this article, I present a Bayesian phylogenetic method that evaluates the adequacy of evolutionary models using posterior predictive distributions. By evaluating a model's posterior predictive performance, an adequate model can be selected for a Bayesian phylogenetic study. Although I present a single test statistic that assesses the overall (global) performance of a phylogenetic model, a variety of test statistics can be tailored to evaluate specific features (local performance) of evolutionary models to identify sources failure. The method presented here, unlike the likelihood-ratio test and parametric bootstrap, accounts for uncertainty in the phylogeny and model parameters.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Blanquart and N. Lartillot A Site- and Time-Heterogeneous Model of Amino Acid Replacement Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2008; 25(5): 842 - 858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. White, S. Hills, R Gaddam, B. Holland, and D. Penny Treeness Triangles: Visualizing the Loss of Phylogenetic Signal Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2007; 24(9): 2029 - 2039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. T. T. Edwards, E. C. Holmes, O. G. Pybus, D. J. Wilson, R. P. Viscidi, E. J. Abrams, R. E. Phillips, and A. J. Drummond Evolution of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Envelope Gene Is Dominated by Purifying Selection Genetics, November 1, 2006; 174(3): 1441 - 1453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Ababneh, L. S. Jermiin, C. Ma, and J. Robinson Matched-pairs tests of homogeneity with applications to homologous nucleotide sequences Bioinformatics, May 15, 2006; 22(10): 1225 - 1231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Wilson and G. McVean Estimating Diversifying Selection and Functional Constraint in the Presence of Recombination Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1411 - 1425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Liu, T. Wilson, and J. W. Hastings Molecular evolution of dinoflagellate luciferases, enzymes with three catalytic domains in a single polypeptide PNAS, November 23, 2004; 101(47): 16555 - 16560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Krishnan, H. Seligmann, C.-B. Stewart, A. P. J. de Koning, and D. D. Pollock Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction in Primate Mitochondrial DNA: Compositional Bias and Effect on Functional Inference Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2004; 21(10): 1871 - 1883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



