Molecular Biology and Evolution 19:1022-1025 (2002)
© 2002 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution
Ratios of Radical to Conservative Amino Acid Replacement are Affected by Mutational and Compositional Factors and May Not Be Indicative of Positive Darwinian Selection
Department of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University
The ratio of radical to conservative amino acid replacements is frequently used to infer positive Darwinian selection. This method is based on the assumption that radical replacements are more likely than conservative replacements to improve the function of a protein. Therefore, if positive selection plays a major role in the evolution of a protein, one would expect the radical-conservative ratio to exceed the expectation under neutrality. Here, we investigate the possibility that factors unrelated to selection, i.e., transition-transversion ratio, codon usage, genetic code, and amino acid composition, influence the radical-conservative replacement ratio. All factors that have been studied were found to affect the radical-conservative replacement ratio. In particular, amino acid composition and transition-transversion ratio are shown to have the most profound effects. Because none of the studied factors had anything to do with selection (positive or otherwise) and also because all of them (singly or in combination) affected a measure that was supposed to be indicative of positive selection, we conclude that selectional inferences based on radical-conservative replacement ratios should be treated with suspicion.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Gojobori, H. Tang, J. M. Akey, and C.-I Wu Adaptive evolution in humans revealed by the negative correlation between the polymorphism and fixation phases of evolution PNAS, March 6, 2007; 104(10): 3907 - 3912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. P. Gorlov, M. Kimmel, and C. I. Amos Strength of the purifying selection against different categories of the point mutations in the coding regions of the human genome Hum. Mol. Genet., April 1, 2006; 15(7): 1143 - 1150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Tang and C.-I Wu A New Method for Estimating Nonsynonymous Substitutions and Its Applications to Detecting Positive Selection Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2006; 23(2): 372 - 379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Richards, Y. Liu, B. R. Bettencourt, P. Hradecky, S. Letovsky, R. Nielsen, K. Thornton, M. J. Hubisz, R. Chen, R. P. Meisel, et al. Comparative genome sequencing of Drosophila pseudoobscura: Chromosomal, gene, and cis-element evolution Genome Res., January 1, 2005; 15(1): 1 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Wang and J. Zhang Rapid Evolution of Mammalian X-Linked Testis-Expressed Homeobox Genes Genetics, June 1, 2004; 167(2): 879 - 888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Choi and B. T. Lahn Adaptive Evolution of MRG, a Neuron-Specific Gene Family Implicated in Nociception Genome Res., October 1, 2003; 13(10): 2252 - 2259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




