Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (37)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thornton, K.
Right arrow Articles by Long, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thornton, K.
Right arrow Articles by Long, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution 19:918-925 (2002)
© 2002 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution

Rapid Divergence of Gene Duplicates on the Drosophila melanogaster X Chromosome

Kevin Thornton and Manyuan Long

*Committee on Genetics
{dagger}Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago

The recent sequencing of several eukaryotic genomes has generated considerable interest in the study of gene duplication events. The classical model of duplicate gene evolution is that recurrent mutation ultimately results in one copy becoming a pseudogene, and only rarely will a beneficial new function evolve. Here, we study divergence between coding sequence duplications in Drosophila melanogaster as a function of the linkage relationship between paralogs. The mean Ka/Ks between all duplicates in the D. melanogaster genome is 0.2803, indicating that purifying selection is maintaining the structure of duplicate coding sequences. However, the mean Ka/Ks between duplicates that are both on the X chromosome is 0.4701, significantly higher than the genome average. Further, the distribution of Ka/Ks for these X-linked duplicates is significantly shifted toward higher values when compared with the distributions for paralogs in other linkage relationships. Two models of molecular evolution provide qualitative explanations of these observations—relaxation of selective pressure on the duplicate copies and, more likely, positive selection on recessive adaptations. We also show that there is an excess of X-linked duplicates with low Ks, suggesting a larger proportion of relatively young duplicates on the D. melanogaster X chromosome relative to autosomes.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
S.-Y. Jiang, A. Christoffels, R. Ramamoorthy, and S. Ramachandran
Expansion Mechanisms and Functional Annotations of Hypothetical Genes in the Rice Genome
Plant Physiology, August 1, 2009; 150(4): 1997 - 2008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
N. D. Singh, P. F. Arndt, A. G. Clark, and C. F. Aquadro
Strong Evidence for Lineage and Sequence Specificity of Substitution Rates and Patterns in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2009; 26(7): 1591 - 1605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
H. Ellegren
Genomic evidence for a large-Z effect
Proc R Soc B, January 22, 2009; 276(1655): 361 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J HeredHome page
K. H. Takahashi, K. Tanaka, M. Itoh, and T. Takano-Shimizu
Reduced X-Linked Rare Polymorphism in Males in Comparison to Females of Drosophila melanogaster
J. Hered., January 1, 2009; 100(1): 97 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
B. D. Rodgers and D. K. Garikipati
Clinical, Agricultural, and Evolutionary Biology of Myostatin: A Comparative Review
Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2008; 29(5): 513 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. F. Baines, S. A. Sawyer, D. L. Hartl, and J. Parsch
Effects of X-Linkage and Sex-Biased Gene Expression on the Rate of Adaptive Protein Evolution in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2008; 25(8): 1639 - 1650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
C. Fan, Y. Chen, and M. Long
Recurrent Tandem Gene Duplication Gave Rise to Functionally Divergent Genes in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2008; 25(7): 1451 - 1458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
N. D. Singh, A. M. Larracuente, and A. G. Clark
Contrasting the Efficacy of Selection on the X and Autosomes in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2008; 25(2): 454 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
J. E. Mank, E. Axelsson, and H. Ellegren
Fast-X on the Z: Rapid evolution of sex-linked genes in birds
Genome Res., May 1, 2007; 17(5): 618 - 624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
R. D. Morin, E. Chang, A. Petrescu, N. Liao, M. Griffith, R. Kirkpatrick, Y. S. Butterfield, A. C. Young, J. Stott, S. Barber, et al.
Sequencing and analysis of 10,967 full-length cDNA clones from Xenopus laevis and Xenopus tropicalis reveals post-tetraploidization transcriptome remodeling
Genome Res., June 1, 2006; 16(6): 796 - 803.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
K. Thornton, D. Bachtrog, and P. Andolfatto
X chromosomes and autosomes evolve at similar rates in Drosophila: No evidence for faster-X protein evolution
Genome Res., April 1, 2006; 16(4): 498 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
V. Boeva, M. Regnier, D. Papatsenko, and V. Makeev
Short fuzzy tandem repeats in genomic sequences, identification, and possible role in regulation of gene expression
Bioinformatics, March 15, 2006; 22(6): 676 - 684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
S.-Y. Jiang and S. Ramachandran
Comparative and evolutionary analysis of genes encoding small GTPases and their activating proteins in eukaryotic genomes
Physiol Genomics, February 23, 2006; 24(3): 235 - 251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
G. M. Wilson, S. Flibotte, P. I. Missirlis, M. A. Marra, S. Jones, K. Thornton, A. G. Clark, and R. A. Holt
Identification by full-coverage array CGH of human DNA copy number increases relative to chimpanzee and gorilla
Genome Res., February 1, 2006; 16(2): 173 - 181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
N. D. Singh, J. C. Davis, and D. A. Petrov
X-Linked Genes Evolve Higher Codon Bias in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis
Genetics, September 1, 2005; 171(1): 145 - 155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
K. Thornton and M. Long
Excess of Amino Acid Substitutions Relative to Polymorphism Between X-Linked Duplications in Drosophila melanogaster
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2005; 22(2): 273 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. J. Betancourt, Y. Kim, and H. A. Orr
A Pseudohitchhiking Model of X vs. Autosomal Diversity
Genetics, December 1, 2004; 168(4): 2261 - 2269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. L. Wayne, Y.-J. Pan, S. V. Nuzhdin, and L. M. McIntyre
Additivity and trans-acting Effects on Gene Expression in Male Drosophila simulans
Genetics, November 1, 2004; 168(3): 1413 - 1420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
Z. Zhang and H. Kishino
Genomic Background Predicts the Fate of Duplicated Genes: Evidence From the Yeast Genome
Genetics, April 1, 2004; 166(4): 1995 - 1999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
Z. Zhang and H. Kishino
Genomic Background Drives the Divergence of Duplicated Amylase Genes at Synonymous Sites in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2004; 21(2): 222 - 227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
E. Betran, K. Thornton, and M. Long
Retroposed New Genes Out of the X in Drosophila
Genome Res., December 1, 2002; 12(12): 1854 - 1859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. J. Betancourt, D. C. Presgraves, and W. J. Swanson
A Test for Faster X Evolution in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2002; 19(10): 1816 - 1819.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.