Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guindon, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gascuel, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guindon, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gascuel, O.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution 19:534-543 (2002)
© 2002 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution

Efficient Biased Estimation of Evolutionary Distances When Substitution Rates Vary Across Sites

Stéphane Guindon and Olivier Gascuel

LIRMM, UMR 9928 Université Montpellier II/CNRS

This paper deals with phylogenetic inference when the variability of substitution rates across sites (VRAS) is modeled by a gamma distribution. We show that underestimating VRAS, which results in underestimates for the evolutionary distances between sequences, usually improves the topological accuracy of phylogenetic tree inference by distance-based methods, especially when the molecular clock holds. We propose a method to estimate the gamma shape parameter value which is most suited for tree topology inference, given the sequences at hand. This method is based on the pairwise evolutionary distances between sequences and allows one to reconstruct the phylogeny of a high number of taxa (>1,000). Simulation results show that the topological accuracy is highly improved when using the gamma shape parameter value given by our method, compared with the true (unknown) value which was used to generate the data. Furthermore, when VRAS is high, the topological accuracy of our distance-based method is better than that of a maximum likelihood approach. Finally, a data set of Maoricicada species sequences is analyzed, which confirms the advantage of our method.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
M. T Holder, D. J Zwickl, and C. Dessimoz
Evaluating the robustness of phylogenetic methods to among-site variability in substitution processes
Phil Trans R Soc B, December 27, 2008; 363(1512): 4013 - 4021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Syst BiolHome page
H. A. Ross, S. Murugan, and W. L. Sibon Li
Testing the Reliability of Genetic Methods of Species Identification via Simulation
Syst Biol, April 1, 2008; 57(2): 216 - 230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
U. Gophna, J. R. Thompson, Y. Boucher, and W. F. Doolittle
Complex Histories of Genes Encoding 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoenzymeA Reductase
Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2006; 23(1): 168 - 178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
H. Philippe, E. A. Snell, E. Bapteste, P. Lopez, P. W. H. Holland, and D. Casane
Phylogenomics of Eukaryotes: Impact of Missing Data on Large Alignments
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2004; 21(9): 1740 - 1752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Pei, N. V. Dokholyan, E. I. Shakhnovich, and N. V. Grishin
Using protein design for homology detection and active site searches
PNAS, September 30, 2003; 100(20): 11361 - 11366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
V. Ranwez and O. Gascuel
Improvement of Distance-Based Phylogenetic Methods by a Local Maximum Likelihood Approach Using Triplets
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2002; 19(11): 1952 - 1963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.