Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (99)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mallatt, J.
Right arrow Articles by Winchell, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mallatt, J.
Right arrow Articles by Winchell, C. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution 19:289-301 (2002)
© 2002 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution

Testing the New Animal Phylogeny: First Use of Combined Large-Subunit and Small-Subunit rRNA Gene Sequences to Classify the Protostomes

Jon Mallatt and Christopher J. Winchell

School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University

Although the small-subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) gene is widely used in the molecular systematics, few large-subunit (LSU) rRNA gene sequences are known from protostome animals, and the value of the LSU gene for invertebrate systematics has not been explored. The goal of this study is to test whether combined LSU and SSU rRNA gene sequences support the division of protostomes into Ecdysozoa (molting forms) and Lophotrochozoa, as was proposed by Aguinaldo et al. (1997) (Nature 387:489) based on SSU rRNA sequences alone. Nearly complete LSU gene sequences were obtained, and combined LSU + SSU sequences were assembled, for 15 distantly related protostome taxa plus five deuterostome outgroups. When the aligned LSU + SSU sequences were analyzed by tree-building methods (minimum evolution analysis of LogDet-transformed distances, maximum likelihood, and maximum parsimony) and by spectral analysis of LogDet distances, both Ecdysozoa and Lophotrochozoa were indeed strongly supported (e.g., bootstrap values >90%), with higher support than from the SSU sequences alone. Furthermore, with the LogDet-based methods, the LSU + SSU sequences resolved some accepted subgroups within Ecdysozoa and Lophotrochozoa (e.g., the polychaete sequence grouped with the echiuran, and the annelid sequences grouped with the mollusc and lophophorates)—subgroups that SSU-based studies do not reveal. Also, the mollusc sequence grouped with the sequences from lophophorates (brachiopod and phoronid). Like SSU sequences, our LSU + SSU sequences contradict older hypotheses that grouped annelids with arthropods as Articulata, that said flatworms and nematodes were basal bilateralians, and considered lophophorates, nemerteans, and chaetognaths to be deuterostomes. The position of chaetognaths within protostomes remains uncertain: our chaetognath sequence associated with that of an onychophoran, but this was unstable and probably artifactual. Finally, the benefits of combining LSU with SSU sequences for phylogenetic analyses are discussed: LSU adds signal, it can be used at lower taxonomic levels, and its core region is easy to align across distant taxa—but its base frequencies tend to be nonstationary across such taxa. We conclude that molecular systematists should use combined LSU + SSU rRNA genes rather than SSU alone.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
T. H. Struck and F. Fisse
Phylogenetic Position of Nemertea Derived from Phylogenomic Data
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2008; 25(4): 728 - 736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.Home page
T. Stoeck, S. Jost, and J. Boenigk
Multigene phylogenies of clonal Spumella-like strains, a cryptic heterotrophic nanoflagellate, isolated from different geographical regions
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, March 1, 2008; 58(3): 716 - 724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
D. Q. Matus, K. M. Halanych, and M. Q. Martindale
The Hox gene complement of a pelagic chaetognath, Flaccisagitta enflata
Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2007; 47(6): 854 - 864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
B. Hausdorf, M. Helmkampf, A. Meyer, A. Witek, H. Herlyn, I. Bruchhaus, T. Hankeln, T. H. Struck, and B. Lieb
Spiralian Phylogenomics Supports the Resurrection of Bryozoa Comprising Ectoprocta and Entoprocta
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2007; 24(12): 2723 - 2729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. Zheng, I. B. Rogozin, E. V. Koonin, and T. M. Przytycka
Support for the Coelomata Clade of Animals from a Rigorous Analysis of the Pattern of Intron Conservation
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2007; 24(11): 2583 - 2592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
I. B. Rogozin, Y. I. Wolf, L. Carmel, and E. V. Koonin
Ecdysozoan Clade Rejected by Genome-Wide Analysis of Rare Amino Acid Replacements
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2007; 24(4): 1080 - 1090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
Y. Valles and J. L. Boore
Lophotrochozoan mitochondrial genomes
Integr. Comp. Biol., August 1, 2006; 46(4): 544 - 557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. Giribet, A. Okusu, A. R. Lindgren, S. W. Huff, M. Schrodl, and M. K. Nishiguchi
Evidence for a clade composed of molluscs with serially repeated structures: Monoplacophorans are related to chitons
PNAS, May 16, 2006; 103(20): 7723 - 7728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
A. G. Collins, P. Cartwright, C. S. McFadden, and B. Schierwater
Phylogenetic Context and Basal Metazoan Model Systems
Integr. Comp. Biol., August 1, 2005; 45(4): 585 - 594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
Y.-x. Luan, J. M. Mallatt, R.-d. Xie, Y.-m. Yang, and W.-y. Yin
The Phylogenetic Positions of Three Basal-Hexapod Groups (Protura, Diplura, and Collembola) Based on Ribosomal RNA Gene Sequences
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2005; 22(7): 1579 - 1592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
K. J. Peterson, M. A. McPeek, and D. A. D. Evans
Tempo and mode of early animal evolution: inferences from rocks, Hox, and molecular clocks
Paleobiology, June 1, 2005; 31(2_Suppl): 36 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
H. Philippe, N. Lartillot, and H. Brinkmann
Multigene Analyses of Bilaterian Animals Corroborate the Monophyly of Ecdysozoa, Lophotrochozoa, and Protostomia
Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2005; 22(5): 1246 - 1253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
G. K. Philip, C. J. Creevey, and J. O. McInerney
The Opisthokonta and the Ecdysozoa May Not Be Clades: Stronger Support for the Grouping of Plant and Animal than for Animal and Fungi and Stronger Support for the Coelomata than Ecdysozoa
Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2005; 22(5): 1175 - 1184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. J Telford, M. J Wise, and V. Gowri-Shankar
Consideration of RNA Secondary Structure Significantly Improves Likelihood-Based Estimates of Phylogeny: Examples from the Bilateria
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2005; 22(4): 1129 - 1136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. W. Roy and W. Gilbert
Resolution of a deep animal divergence by the pattern of intron conservation
PNAS, March 22, 2005; 102(12): 4403 - 4408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
D. Papillon, Y. Perez, X. Caubit, and Y. Le Parco
Identification of Chaetognaths as Protostomes Is Supported by the Analysis of Their Mitochondrial Genome
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2004; 21(11): 2122 - 2129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. Bertrand, F. G. Brunet, H. Escriva, G. Parmentier, V. Laudet, and M. Robinson-Rechavi
Evolutionary Genomics of Nuclear Receptors: From Twenty-Five Ancestral Genes to Derived Endocrine Systems
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2004; 21(10): 1923 - 1937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
H. Philippe, E. A. Snell, E. Bapteste, P. Lopez, P. W. H. Holland, and D. Casane
Phylogenomics of Eukaryotes: Impact of Missing Data on Large Alignments
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2004; 21(9): 1740 - 1752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. A. Gontcharov, B. Marin, and M. Melkonian
Are Combined Analyses Better Than Single Gene Phylogenies? A Case Study Using SSU rDNA and rbcL Sequence Comparisons in the Zygnematophyceae (Streptophyta)
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2004; 21(3): 612 - 624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
S. N. Austad
On Herrera and Jagadeeswaran's "Annual Fish as a Genetic Model for Aging"
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., February 1, 2004; 59(2): B99 - 100.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
Y. I. Wolf, I. B. Rogozin, and E. V. Koonin
Coelomata and Not Ecdysozoa: Evidence From Genome-Wide Phylogenetic Analysis
Genome Res., January 1, 2004; 14(1): 29 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
G. Balavoine and A. Adoutte
The Segmented Urbilateria: A Testable Scenario
Integr. Comp. Biol., February 1, 2003; 43(1): 137 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
I. Ruiz-Trillo, J. Paps, M. Loukota, C. Ribera, U. Jondelius, J. Baguna, and M. Riutort
A phylogenetic analysis of myosin heavy chain type II sequences corroborates that Acoela and Nemertodermatida are basal bilaterians
PNAS, August 20, 2002; 99(17): 11246 - 11251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.