Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (49)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Randi, E.
Right arrow Articles by Sforzi, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Randi, E.
Right arrow Articles by Sforzi, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution 18:1679-1693 (2001)
© 2001 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution

Genetic Identification of Wild and Domestic Cats (Felis silvestris) and Their Hybrids Using Bayesian Clustering Methods

Ettore Randi, Massimo Pierpaoli, Mark Beaumont, Bernardino Ragni and Andrea Sforzi

Istituto Nazionale per la Fauna Selvatica, Ozzano dell'Emilia (BO), Italy;
School of Animal and Microbial Sciences, Whiteknights, Reading, England;
Dipartimento di Biologia Animale ed Ecologia, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy;
Gruppo di Etologia ed Ecologia Comportamentale, Dipartimento di Biologia Evolutiva, Università di Siena, Siena, Italy

Crossbreeding with free-ranging domestic cats is supposed to threaten the genetic integrity of wildcat populations in Europe, although the diagnostic markers to identify "pure" or "admixed" wildcats have never been clearly defined. Here we use mitochondrial (mt) DNA sequences and allelic variation at 12 microsatellite loci to genotype 128 wild and domestic cats sampled in Italy which were preclassified into three separate groups: European wildcats (Felis silvestris silvestris), Sardinian wildcats (Felis silvestris libyca), and domestic cats (Felis silvestris catus), according to their coat color patterns, collection localities, and other phenotypical traits, independently of any genetic information. For comparison, we included some captive-reared hybrids of European wild and domestic cats. Genetic variability was significantly partitioned among the three groups (mtDNA estimate of FST = 0.36; microsatellite estimate of RST = 0.30; P < 0.001), suggesting that morphological diversity reflects the existence of distinct gene pools. Multivariate ordination of individual genotypes and clustering of interindividual genetic distances also showed evidence of distinct cat groups, partially congruent with the morphological classification. Cluster analysis, however, did not enable hybrid cats to be identified from genetic information alone, nor were all individuals assigned to their populations. In contrast, a Bayesian admixture analysis simultaneously assigned the European wildcats, the Sardinian wildcats, and the domestic cats to different clusters, independent of any prior information, and pointed out the admixed gene composition of the hybrids, which were assigned to more than one cluster. Only one putative Sardinian wildcat was assigned to the domestic cat cluster, and one presumed European wildcat showed mixed (hybrid) ancestry in the domestic cat gene pool. Mitochondrial DNA sequences indicated that three additional presumed European wildcats might have hybrid ancestry. These four cats were sampled from the same area in the northernmost edge of the European wildcat distribution in the Italian Apennines. Admixture analyses suggest that wild and domestic cats in Italy are distinct, reproductively isolated gene pools and that introgression of domestic alleles into the wild-living population is very limited and geographically localized.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J HeredHome page
P. J. Wilson, S. K. Grewal, F. F. Mallory, and B. N. White
Genetic Characterization of Hybrid Wolves across Ontario
J. Hered., July 1, 2009; 100(suppl_1): S80 - S89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
R. Oliveira, R. Godinho, E. Randi, and P. C Alves
Hybridization versus conservation: are domestic cats threatening the genetic integrity of wildcats (Felis silvestris silvestris) in Iberian Peninsula?
Phil Trans R Soc B, September 12, 2008; 363(1505): 2953 - 2961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ScienceHome page
C. A. Driscoll, M. Menotti-Raymond, A. L. Roca, K. Hupe, W. E. Johnson, E. Geffen, E. H. Harley, M. Delibes, D. Pontier, A. C. Kitchener, et al.
The Near Eastern Origin of Cat Domestication
Science, July 27, 2007; 317(5837): 519 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J HeredHome page
E. D. Lorenzen, P. Arctander, and H. R. Siegismund
Regional Genetic Structuring and Evolutionary History of the Impala Aepyceros melampus
J. Hered., March 1, 2006; 97(2): 119 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J HeredHome page
B. Guinand, A. Topchy, K. S. Page, M. K. Burnham-Curtis, W. F. Punch, and K. T. Scribner
Comparisons of Likelihood and Machine Learning Methods of Individual Classification
J. Hered., July 1, 2002; 93(4): 260 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.