Molecular Biology and Evolution 18:1558-1565 (2001)
© 2001 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution
A Family of Selfish Minicircular Chromosomes with Jumbled Chloroplast Gene Fragments from a Dinoflagellate
Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Chloroplast genes of several dinoflagellate species are located on unigenic DNA minicircular chromosomes. We have now completely sequenced five aberrant minicircular chromosomes from the dinoflagellate Heterocapsa triquetra. These probably nonfunctional DNA circles lack complete genes, with each being composed of several short fragments of two or three different chloroplast genes and a common conserved region with a tripartite 9G-9A-9G core like the putative replicon origin of functional single-gene circular chloroplast chromosomes. Their sequences imply that all five circles evolved by differential deletions and duplications from common ancestral circles bearing fragments of four genes: psbA, psbC, 16S rRNA, and 23S rRNA. It appears that recombination between separate unigenic chromosomes initially gave intermediate heterodimers, which were subsequently stabilized by deletions that included part or all of one putative replicon origin. We suggest that homologous recombination at the 9G-9A-9G core regions produced a psbA/psbC heterodimer which generated two distinct chimeric circles by differential deletions and duplications. A 23S/16S rRNA heterodimer more likely formed by illegitimate recombination between 16S and 23S rRNA genes. Homologous recombination between the 9G-9A-9G core regions of both heterodimers and additional differential deletions and duplications could then have yielded the other three circles. Near identity of the gene fragments and 9G-9A-9G cores, despite diverging adjacent regions, may be maintained by gene conversion. The conserved organization of the 9G-9A-9G cores alone favors the idea that they are replicon origins and suggests that they may enable the aberrant minicircles to parasitize the chloroplast's replication machinery as selfish circles.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. K. Leung and J. T. Y. Wong The replication of plastid minicircles involves rolling circle intermediates Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2009; 37(6): 1991 - 2002. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Howe, R. E. R. Nisbet, and A. C. Barbrook The remarkable chloroplast genome of dinoflagellates J. Exp. Bot., March 3, 2008; (2008) erm292v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Laatsch, S. Zauner, B. Stoebe-Maier, K. V. Kowallik, and U.-G. Maier Plastid-Derived Single Gene Minicircles of the Dinoflagellate Ceratium horridum Are Localized in the Nucleus Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2004; 21(7): 1318 - 1322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Zhang, T. Cavalier-Smith, and B. R. Green Evolution of Dinoflagellate Unigenic Minicircles and the Partially Concerted Divergence of Their Putative Replicon Origins Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2002; 19(4): 489 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


