Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (32)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Begun, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Begun, D. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution 18:1343-1352 (2001)
© 2001 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution

The Frequency Distribution of Nucleotide Variation in Drosophila simulans

David J. Begun

Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California at Davis

Patterns of codon bias in Drosophila suggest that silent mutations can be classified into two types: unpreferred (slightly deleterious) and preferred (slightly beneficial). Results of previous analyses of polymorphism and divergence in Drosophila simulans were interpreted as supporting a mutation-selection-drift model in which slightly deleterious, silent mutants make significantly greater contributions to polymorphism than to divergence. Frequencies of unpreferred polymorphisms were inferred to be lower than frequencies of other silent polymorphisms. Here, I analyzed additional D. simulans data to reevaluate the support for these ideas. I found that D. simulans has fixed more unpreferred than preferred mutations, suggesting that this lineage has not been at mutation-selection-drift equilibrium at silent sites. Frequencies of polarized unpreferred polymorphisms are not skewed toward rare alleles. However, frequencies of unpolarized unpreferred codons are lower in high-bias genes than in low-bias genes. This supports the idea that unpreferred codons are borderline deleterious mutations. Purifying selection on silent sites appears to be stronger at twofold-degenerate codons than at fourfold-degenerate codons. Finally, I found that X-linked polymorphisms occur at a higher average frequency than polymorphisms on chromosome arm 3R, even though an average X-linked site is significantly less likely to be polymorphic than an average site on 3R. This result supports a previous analysis of D. simulans indicating different population genetics of X-linked versus autosomal mutations.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
P. R. Haddrill, D. Bachtrog, and P. Andolfatto
Positive and Negative Selection on Noncoding DNA in Drosophila simulans
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2008; 25(9): 1825 - 1834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. Heger and C. P. Ponting
Variable Strength of Translational Selection Among 12 Drosophila Species
Genetics, November 1, 2007; 177(3): 1337 - 1348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. Flowers, E Sezgin, S Kumagai, D. Duvernell, L. Matzkin, P. Schmidt, and W. Eanes
Adaptive Evolution of Metabolic Pathways in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2007; 24(6): 1347 - 1354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. J. Welch
Estimating the Genomewide Rate of Adaptive Protein Evolution in Drosophila
Genetics, June 1, 2006; 173(2): 821 - 837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
H. Akashi, W.-Y. Ko, S. Piao, A. John, P. Goel, C.-F. Lin, and A. P. Vitins
Molecular Evolution in the Drosophila melanogaster Species Subgroup: Frequent Parameter Fluctuations on the Timescale of Molecular Divergence
Genetics, March 1, 2006; 172(3): 1711 - 1726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. C. Fay and J. A. Benavides
Hypervariable Noncoding Sequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Genetics, August 1, 2005; 170(4): 1575 - 1587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. D. Kern and D. J. Begun
Patterns of Polymorphism and Divergence from Noncoding Sequences of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: Evidence for Nonequilibrium Processes
Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2005; 22(1): 51 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
D. D. Shoemaker, K. A. Dyer, M. Ahrens, K. McAbee, and J. Jaenike
Decreased Diversity but Increased Substitution Rate in Host mtDNA as a Consequence of Wolbachia Endosymbiont Infection
Genetics, December 1, 2004; 168(4): 2049 - 2058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
H. Qin, W. B. Wu, J. M. Comeron, M. Kreitman, and W.-H. Li
Intragenic Spatial Patterns of Codon Usage Bias in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Genomes
Genetics, December 1, 2004; 168(4): 2245 - 2260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. M. Comeron
Selective and Mutational Patterns Associated With Gene Expression in Humans: Influences on Synonymous Composition and Intron Presence
Genetics, July 1, 2004; 167(3): 1293 - 1304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
N. Bierne and A. Eyre-Walker
The Genomic Rate of Adaptive Amino Acid Substitution in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2004; 21(7): 1350 - 1360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
V. B. DuMont, J. C. Fay, P. P. Calabrese, and C. F. Aquadro
DNA Variability and Divergence at the Notch Locus in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: A Case of Accelerated Synonymous Site Divergence
Genetics, May 1, 2004; 167(1): 171 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
E. Gravot, M. Huet, and M. Veuille
Effect of Breeding Structure on Population Genetic Parameters in Drosophila
Genetics, February 1, 2004; 166(2): 779 - 788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
T. A. Schlenke and D. J. Begun
Natural Selection Drives Drosophila Immune System Evolution
Genetics, August 1, 2003; 164(4): 1471 - 1480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
D. J. Begun and P. Whitley
Molecular Population Genetics of Xdh and the Evolution of Base Composition in Drosophila
Genetics, December 1, 2002; 162(4): 1725 - 1735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. D. Kern, C. D. Jones, and D. J. Begun
Genomic Effects of Nucleotide Substitutions in Drosophila simulans
Genetics, December 1, 2002; 162(4): 1753 - 1761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. Eyre-Walker
Changing Effective Population Size and the McDonald-Kreitman Test
Genetics, December 1, 2002; 162(4): 2017 - 2024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. Eyre-Walker, P. D. Keightley, N. G. C. Smith, and D. Gaffney
Quantifying the Slightly Deleterious Mutation Model of Molecular Evolution
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2002; 19(12): 2142 - 2149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. M. Comeron and M. Kreitman
Population, Evolutionary and Genomic Consequences of Interference Selection
Genetics, May 1, 2002; 161(1): 389 - 410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. Hey and R. M. Kliman
Interactions Between Natural Selection, Recombination and Gene Density in the Genes of Drosophila
Genetics, February 1, 2002; 160(2): 595 - 608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
D. J. Begun
Protein Variation in Drosophila simulans, and Comparison of Genes from Centromeric Versus Noncentromeric Regions of Chromosome 3
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2002; 19(2): 201 - 203.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.