Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (31)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Conant, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, P. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Conant, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, P. O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution 18:1024-1033 (2001)
© 2001 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ARTICLE

Effects of Nucleotide Composition Bias on the Success of the Parsimony Criterion in Phylogenetic Inference

Gavin C. Conant and Paul O. Lewis

Department of Biology, University of New Mexico
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut

Convergence in nucleotide composition (CNC) in unrelated lineages is a factor potentially affecting the performance of most phylogeny reconstruction methods. Such convergence has deleterious effects because unrelated lineages show similarities due to similar nucleotide compositions and not shared histories. While some methods (such as the LogDet/paralinear distance measure) avoid this pitfall, the amount of convergence in nucleotide composition necessary to deceive other phylogenetic methods has never been quantified. We examined analytically the relationship between convergence in nucleotide composition and the consistency of parsimony as a phylogenetic estimator for four taxa. Our results show that rather extreme amounts of convergence are necessary before parsimony begins to prefer the incorrect tree. Ancillary observations are that (for unweighted Fitch parsimony) transition/transversion bias contributes to the impact of CNC and, for a given amount of CNC and fixed branch lengths, data sets exhibiting substantial site-to-site rate heterogeneity present fewer difficulties than data sets in which rates are homogeneous. We conclude by reexamining a data set originally used to illustrate the problems caused by CNC. Using simulations, we show that in this case the convergence in nucleotide composition alone is insufficient to cause any commonly used methods to fail, and accounting for other evolutionary factors (such as site-to-site rate heterogeneity) can give a correct inference without accounting for CNC.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
N. C. Sheffield, H. Song, S. L. Cameron, and M. F. Whiting
Nonstationary Evolution and Compositional Heterogeneity in Beetle Mitochondrial Phylogenomics
Syst Biol, August 1, 2009; 58(4): 381 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
N. Rodriguez-Ezpeleta, H. Brinkmann, B. Roure, N. Lartillot, B. F. Lang, and H. Philippe
Detecting and Overcoming Systematic Errors in Genome-Scale Phylogenies
Syst Biol, June 1, 2007; 56(3): 389 - 399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
V. Gowri-Shankar and M. Rattray
A Reversible Jump Method for Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference with a Nonhomogeneous Substitution Model
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2007; 24(6): 1286 - 1299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
V. Jayaswal, J. Robinson, and L. Jermiin
Estimation of Phylogeny and Invariant Sites under the General Markov Model of Nucleotide Sequence Evolution
Syst Biol, April 1, 2007; 56(2): 155 - 162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
K. F. Gruber, R. S. Voss, and S. A. Jansa
Base-Compositional Heterogeneity in the RAG1 Locus among Didelphid Marsupials: Implications for Phylogenetic Inference and the Evolution of GC Content
Syst Biol, February 1, 2007; 56(1): 83 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. T. Herbeck, P. H. Degnan, and J. J. Wernegreen
Nonhomogeneous Model of Sequence Evolution Indicates Independent Origins of Primary Endosymbionts Within the Enterobacteriales ({gamma}-Proteobacteria)
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2005; 22(3): 520 - 532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
T. N. Engstrom, H. B. Shaffer, and W. P. McCord
Multiple Data Sets, High Homoplasy, and the Phylogeny of Softshell Turtles (Testudines: Trionychidae)
Syst Biol, October 1, 2004; 53(5): 693 - 710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
S. Y.W. Ho and L. S. Jermiin
Tracing the Decay of the Historical Signal in Biological Sequence Data
Syst Biol, August 1, 2004; 53(4): 623 - 637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
L. S. Jermiin, S. Y.W. Ho, F. Ababneh, J. Robinson, and A. W.D. Larkum
The Biasing Effect of Compositional Heterogeneity on Phylogenetic Estimates May be Underestimated
Syst Biol, August 1, 2004; 53(4): 638 - 643.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
S. S. Renner and L.-B. Zhang
Biogeography of the Pistia Clade (Araceae): Based on Chloroplast and Mitochondrial DNA Sequences and Bayesian Divergence Time Inference
Syst Biol, June 1, 2004; 53(3): 422 - 432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
P. G. Foster
Modeling Compositional Heterogeneity
Syst Biol, June 1, 2004; 53(3): 485 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. S. Rosenberg and S. Kumar
Heterogeneity of Nucleotide Frequencies Among Evolutionary Lineages and Phylogenetic Inference
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2003; 20(4): 610 - 621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S. A. Kelchner
Group II introns as phylogenetic tools: structure, function, and evolutionary constraints
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2002; 89(10): 1651 - 1669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.