Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (36)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhivotovsky, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhivotovsky, L. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution 18:700-709 (2001)
© 2001 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ARTICLE

Estimating Divergence Time with the Use of Microsatellite Genetic Distances: Impacts of Population Growth and Gene Flow

Lev A. Zhivotovsky

N. I. Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

Genetic distances play an important role in estimating divergence time of bifurcated populations. However, they can be greatly affected by demographic processes, such as migration and population dynamics, which complicate their interpretation. For example, the widely used distance for microsatellite loci, ({delta}µ), assumes constant population size, no gene flow, and mutation-drift equilibrium. It is shown here that ({delta}µ) strongly underestimates divergence time if populations are growing and/or connected by gene flow. In recent publications, the average estimate of divergence time between African and non-African populations obtained by using ({delta}µ) is about 34,000 years, although archaeological data show a much earlier presence of modern humans out of Africa. I introduce a different estimator of population separation time based on microsatellite statistics, TD, that does not assume mutation-drift equilibrium, is independent of population dynamics in the absence of gene flow, and is robust to weak migration flow for growing populations. However, it requires a knowledge of the variance in the number of repeats at the beginning of population separation, V0. One way to overcome this problem is to find minimal and maximal bounds for the variance and thus obtain the earliest and latest bounds for divergence time (this is not a confidence interval, and it simply reflects an uncertainty about the value of V0 in an ancestral population). Another way to avoid the uncertainty is to choose from among present populations a reference whose variation is presumably close to what it might have been in an ancestral population. A different approach for using TD is to estimate the time difference between adjacent nodes on a phylogenetic population tree. Using data on variation at autosomal short tandem repeat loci with di-, tri-, and tetranucleotide repeats in worldwide populations, TD gives an estimate of 57,000 years for the separation of the out-of-Africa branch of modern humans from Africans based on the value of V0 in the Southern American Indian populations; the earliest bound for this event has been estimated to be about 135,000 years. The data also suggest that the Asian and European populations diverged from each other about 20,000 years, after the occurrence of the out-of-Africa branch.

Key Words: modern human divergence • microsatellite genetic distance • separation time • population growth • migration flow

Key Words: modern human divergence • microsatellite genetic distance • separation time • population growth • migration flow


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. D. Weaver, C. C. Roseman, and C. B. Stringer
Close correspondence between quantitative- and molecular-genetic divergence times for Neandertals and modern humans
PNAS, March 25, 2008; 105(12): 4645 - 4649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
H. Xu, R. Chakraborty, and Y.-X. Fu
Mutation Rate Variation at Human Dinucleotide Microsatellites
Genetics, May 1, 2005; 170(1): 305 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
U. Ramakrishnan and J. L. Mountain
Precision and Accuracy of Divergence Time Estimates from STR and SNPSTR Variation
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2004; 21(10): 1960 - 1971.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. L. Zegura, T. M. Karafet, L. A. Zhivotovsky, and M. F. Hammer
High-Resolution SNPs and Microsatellite Haplotypes Point to a Single, Recent Entry of Native American Y Chromosomes into the Americas
Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2004; 21(1): 164 - 175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
B. L. Gross, A. E. Schwarzbach, and L. H. Rieseberg
Origin(s) of the diploid hybrid species Helianthus deserticola (Asteraceae)
Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2003; 90(12): 1708 - 1719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
O. J. Hardy, N. Charbonnel, H. Freville, and M. Heuertz
Microsatellite Allele Sizes: A Simple Test to Assess Their Significance on Genetic Differentiation
Genetics, April 1, 2003; 163(4): 1467 - 1482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
J. L. Mountain, A. Knight, M. Jobin, C. Gignoux, A. Miller, A. A. Lin, and P. A. Underhill
SNPSTRs: Empirically Derived, Rapidly Typed, Autosomal Haplotypes for Inference of Population History and Mutational Processes
Genome Res., November 1, 2002; 12(11): 1766 - 1772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
P.-A. Landry, M. T. Koskinen, and C. R. Primmer
Deriving Evolutionary Relationships Among Populations Using Microsatellites and ({delta}{micro})2: All Loci Are Equal, but Some Are More Equal Than Others ...
Genetics, July 1, 2002; 161(3): 1339 - 1347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
L. A. Zhivotovsky, D. B. Goldstein, and M. W. Feldman
Genetic Sampling Error of Distance ({delta}{micro})2 and Variation in Mutation Rate Among Microsatellite Loci
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2001; 18(12): 2141 - 2145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.