Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (31)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Grossman, L. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Grossman, L. I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution 18:563-569 (2001)
© 2001 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ARTICLE

Evolution of Nuclear- and Mitochondrial-Encoded Subunit Interaction in Cytochrome c Oxidase

Timothy R. Schmidt, Wei Wu1,, Morris Goodman and Lawrence I. Grossman,

*Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics
{dagger}Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Wayne State University School of Medicine

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)-encoded proteins function in eukaryotes as subunits of respiratory complexes that also contain nuclear DNA (nDNA)-encoded subunits. The importance of functional interactions between mtDNA- and nDNA-encoded proteins was previously demonstrated by testing the survivability of cybrid cells or individuals containing nDNA and mtDNA from different populations or species. This report focuses on the multisubunit respiratory complex cytochrome c oxidase (COX), made up of both mtDNA-encoded and nDNA-encoded subunits. A combination of evolutionary and crystallographic data is employed to determine whether rates of nonsynonymous substitutions have been higher, the same, or lower for residues in close proximity that are encoded by a different genome (nDNA or mtDNA). This determination is performed by simply taking the ratio, called the interaction ratio i, of the nonsynonymous substitution rate of the close-contact residues to the nonsynonymous substitution rate of the noncontact residues. We assume that the close-contact residues (which are more likely to interact) are functionally important and that, therefore, amino acid replacements among these residues cannot escape the scrutiny of natural selection. i = 1 indicates that the close-contact residues have been under neither greater purifying selection nor greater positive selection than the noncontact residues as a specific consequence of their being encoded by separate genomes. i < 1 indicates that the close-contact residues have been under greater purifying selection but less positive selection than have the noncontact residues. Conversely, i > 1 indicates that the close-contact residues have been under less purifying but greater positive selection than have the noncontact residues. i < 1 may be referred to as a constraining interaction; i.e., the close-contact residues compared with the noncontact residues appear to be under greater structural-functional constraints. On the other hand, i > 1 may be referred to as an optimizing interaction; i.e., apparently many different amino acid replacements are required to optimize this subunit's interaction with the other subunit. A major finding is that the nDNA-encoded residues in close physical proximity to mtDNA-encoded residues evolve more slowly than the other nuclear-encoded residues (and thus display a constraining interaction), whereas the mtDNA-encoded residues in close physical proximity to nDNA-encoded residues evolve more rapidly than the other mitochondrial-encoded residues (and thus display an optimizing interaction). A possible reason for this striking difference between the nuclear- and mitochondrial-encoded COX subunits in how their functional interaction evolves is discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
M. Ingman and U. Gyllensten
Rate variation between mitochondrial domains and adaptive evolution in humans
Hum. Mol. Genet., October 1, 2007; 16(19): 2281 - 2287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
B. S. Ort and G. H. Pogson
Molecular Population Genetics of the Male and Female Mitochondrial DNA Molecules of the California Sea Mussel, Mytilus californianus
Genetics, October 1, 2007; 177(2): 1087 - 1099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
D. A. McClellan, E. J. Palfreyman, M. J. Smith, J. L. Moss, R. G. Christensen, and J. K. Sailsbery
Physicochemical Evolution and Molecular Adaptation of the Cetacean and Artiodactyl Cytochrome b Proteins
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2005; 22(3): 437 - 455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. Das, S. T. Miller, and D. L. Stern
Comparison of Diverse Protein Sequences of the Nuclear-Encoded Subunits of Cytochrome C Oxidase Suggests Conservation of Structure Underlies Evolving Functional Sites
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2004; 21(8): 1572 - 1582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
C. S. Willett and R. S. Burton
Evolution of Interacting Proteins in the Mitochondrial Electron Transport System in a Marine Copepod
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2004; 21(3): 443 - 453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. S. Moilanen, S. Finnila, and K. Majamaa
Lineage-Specific Selection in Human mtDNA: Lack of Polymorphisms in a Segment of MTND5 Gene in Haplogroup J
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2003; 20(12): 2132 - 2142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. Doiron, L. Bernatchez, and P. U. Blier
A Comparative Mitogenomic Analysis of the Potential Adaptive Value of Arctic Charr mtDNA Introgression in Brook Charr Populations (Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill)
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2002; 19(11): 1902 - 1909.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. D. Rawson and R. S. Burton
Functional coadaptation between cytochrome c and cytochrome c oxidase within allopatric populations of a marine copepod
PNAS, October 1, 2002; 99(20): 12955 - 12958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
D. E. Wildman, W. Wu, M. Goodman, and L. I. Grossman
Episodic Positive Selection in Ape Cytochrome c Oxidase Subunit IV
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2002; 19(10): 1812 - 1815.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.