Molecular Biology and Evolution 18:557-562 (2001)
© 2001 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution
ARTICLE |
Differential Selection After Duplication in Mammalian Developmental Genes
Institute of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics, Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University
Gene duplication provides the opportunity for subsequent refinement of distinct functions of the duplicated copies. Either through changes in coding sequence or changes in regulatory regions, duplicate copies appear to obtain new or tissue-specific functions. If this divergence were driven by natural selection, we would expect duplicated copies to have differentiated patterns of substitutions. We tested this hypothesis using genes that duplicated before the human/mouse split and whose orthologous relations were clear. The null hypothesis is that the number of amino acid changes between humans and mice was distributed similarly across different paralogs. We used a method modified from Tang and Lewontin to detect heterogeneity in the amino acid substitution pattern between those different paralogs. Our results show that many of the paralogous gene pairs appear to be under differential selection in the human/mouse comparison. The properties that led to diversification appear to have arisen before the split of the human and mouse lineages. Further study of the diverged genes revealed insights regarding the patterns of amino acid substitution that resulted in differences in function and/or expression of these genes. This approach has utility in the study of newly identified members of gene families in genomewide data mining and for contrasting the merits of alternative hypotheses for the evolutionary divergence of function of duplicated genes.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. W. Hahn Distinguishing Among Evolutionary Models for the Maintenance of Gene Duplicates J. Hered., September 1, 2009; 100(5): 605 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. C. Almeida and R. DeSalle Orthology, Function and Evolution of Accessory Gland Proteins in the Drosophila repleta Group Genetics, January 1, 2009; 181(1): 235 - 245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Brilli, R. Fani, and P. Lio Current trends in the bioinformatic sequence analysis of metabolic pathways in prokaryotes Brief Bioinform, January 1, 2008; 9(1): 34 - 45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Scannell and K. H. Wolfe A burst of protein sequence evolution and a prolonged period of asymmetric evolution follow gene duplication in yeast Genome Res., January 1, 2008; 18(1): 137 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Eyre-Walker, M. Woolfit, and T. Phelps The Distribution of Fitness Effects of New Deleterious Amino Acid Mutations in Humans Genetics, June 1, 2006; 173(2): 891 - 900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Nam, K. Kaufmann, Gün. Theißen, and M. Nei A simple method for predicting the functional differentiation of duplicate genes and its application to MIKC-type MADS-box genes Nucleic Acids Res., January 19, 2005; 33(2): e12 - e12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Blanc and K. H. Wolfe Functional Divergence of Duplicated Genes Formed by Polyploidy during Arabidopsis Evolution PLANT CELL, July 1, 2004; 16(7): 1679 - 1691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Moore and M. D. Purugganan The early stages of duplicate gene evolution PNAS, December 23, 2003; 100(26): 15682 - 15687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. C. Conant and A. Wagner Asymmetric Sequence Divergence of Duplicate Genes Genome Res., September 1, 2003; 13(9): 2052 - 2058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Knudsen, M. M. Miyamoto, P. J. Laipis, and D. N. Silverman Using Evolutionary Rates to Investigate Protein Functional Divergence and Conservation: A Case Study of the Carbonic Anhydrases Genetics, August 1, 2003; 164(4): 1261 - 1269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. T. Dermitzakis, C. M. Bergman, and A. G. Clark Tracing the Evolutionary History of Drosophila Regulatory Regions with Models that Identify Transcription Factor Binding Sites Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2003; 20(5): 703 - 714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Seoighe, C. R. Johnston, and D. C. Shields Significantly Different Patterns of Amino Acid Replacement After Gene Duplication as Compared to After Speciation Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2003; 20(4): 484 - 490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-h. Chiu, C. Amemiya, K. Dewar, C.-B. Kim, F. H. Ruddle, and G. P. Wagner Molecular evolution of the HoxA cluster in the three major gnathostome lineages PNAS, April 16, 2002; 99(8): 5492 - 5497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Knudsen and M. M. Miyamoto A likelihood ratio test for evolutionary rate shifts and functional divergence among proteins PNAS, December 4, 2001; 98(25): 14512 - 14517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lynch, M. O'Hely, B. Walsh, and A. Force The Probability of Preservation of a Newly Arisen Gene Duplicate Genetics, December 1, 2001; 159(4): 1789 - 1804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Gu A Site-specific Measure for Rate Difference After Gene Duplication or Speciation Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2001; 18(12): 2327 - 2330. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wang and X. Gu Functional Divergence in the Caspase Gene Family and Altered Functional Constraints: Statistical Analysis and Prediction Genetics, July 1, 2001; 158(3): 1311 - 1320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-h. Chiu, C. Amemiya, K. Dewar, C.-B. Kim, F. H. Ruddle, and G. P. Wagner Molecular evolution of the HoxA cluster in the three major gnathostome lineages PNAS, April 16, 2002; 99(8): 5492 - 5497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||







