Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Delgado, S.
Right arrow Articles by Girondot, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Delgado, S.
Right arrow Articles by Girondot, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution 18:2146-2153 (2001)
© 2001 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution

Molecular Evidence for Precambrian Origin of Amelogenin, the Major Protein of Vertebrate Enamel

Sidney Delgado, Didier Casane, Laure Bonnaud, Michel Laurin, Jean-Yves Sire and Marc Girondot

UMR 8570, Evolution et Adaptations des Systèmes Ostéomusculaires, Paris, France;
UMR 7622, Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire du Développement, Equipe "Phylogénie, Bioinformatique et Génome," Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France;
Institut Jacques Monod, Equipe "Evolution du Développement des Nématodes," Université Denis Diderot, Paris, France;
UPRESA 8079, Ecologie, Systématique et Evolution, Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France

Although molecular dating of cladogenetic events is possible, no molecular method has been described to date the acquisition of various tissues. Taking into account the specificity of the major protein in enamel in formation (amelogenin), we were able to develop such a method for enamel. Indeed, because the amelogenin protein is exclusively involved in enamel formation and mineralization and because it lacks pleiotropic effects, this protein is a good candidate to estimate the date of acquisition of this highly mineralized tissue. We searched DNA banks for similarities between the amelogenin sequence and other sequences. Similarities were found only to exon 2 of SPARC (osteonectin) in two protostomians and in eight deuterostomians, and to exon 2 of three SPARC-related deuterostomian genes (SC1, hevin, and QR1). The other amelogenin exons did not reveal significant similarities to other sequences. In these proteins, exon 2 mainly encodes the peptide signal that plays the essential role in enabling the protein to be ultimately localized in the extracellular matrix. We tested the significance of the exon 2 similarities. The observed values were always significantly higher than the expected randomly generated similarities. This demonstrates a common evolutionary origin of this exon. The phylogenetic analyses of exon 2 sequences indicated that exon 2 was duplicated to amelogenin from an ancestral SPARC sequence in the deuterostomian lineage before the duplication of deuterostomian SPARC and SC1/hevin/QR1. We were able to date the origin of the latter duplication at approximately 630 MYA. Therefore, amelogenin exon 2 was acquired before this date, in the Proterozoic, long before the so-called "Cambrian explosion," the sudden appearance of several bilateralian phyla in the fossil record at the Proterozoic-Phanerozoic transition. This sudden appearance has been often suggested to reflect intensive cladogenesis during this period. However, molecular dating of protostomian-deuterostomian divergence and of the cladogenesis among several major clades of Bilateralia lead to a different conclusion: many bilateralian clades were already present during the late Proterozoic. It has previously been proposed that these bilateralians were not mineralized and that they had low fossilization potential. Our results strongly suggest that late Proterozoic fossils possessing a mineralized tissue homologous to enamel might be found in the future.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JDRHome page
K. Kawasaki and K.M. Weiss
SCPP Gene Evolution and the Dental Mineralization Continuum
Journal of Dental Research, June 1, 2008; 87(6): 520 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JDRHome page
J.-W. Kim and J.P. Simmer
Hereditary Dentin Defects
Journal of Dental Research, May 1, 2007; 86(5): 392 - 399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. E. Steiper, N. M. Young, and T. Y. Sukarna
Genomic data support the hominoid slowdown and an Early Oligocene estimate for the hominoid-cercopithecoid divergence
PNAS, December 7, 2004; 101(49): 17021 - 17026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of PaleontologyHome page
PATTERNS OF CALIBRATION AGE SENSITIVITY WITH QUARTET DATING METHODS
Journal of Paleontology, January 1, 2004; 78(1): 7 - 30.



Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. Kawasaki and K. M. Weiss
Mineralized tissue and vertebrate evolution: The secretory calcium-binding phosphoprotein gene cluster
PNAS, April 1, 2003; 100(7): 4060 - 4065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.