Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (27)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, B. S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chang, B. S. W.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, D. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution 17:1220-1231 (2000)
© 2000 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


Regular Article

Bias in Phylogenetic Reconstruction of Vertebrate Rhodopsin Sequences

Belinda S. W. Chang1,3, and Dana L. Campbell2,

Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University

Abstract

Two spurious nodes were found in phylogenetic analyses of vertebrate rhodopsin sequences in comparison with well-established vertebrate relationships. These spurious reconstructions were well supported in bootstrap analyses and occurred independently of the method of phylogenetic analysis used (parsimony, distance, or likelihood). Use of this data set of vertebrate rhodopsin sequences allowed us to exploit established vertebrate relationships, as well as the considerable amount known about the molecular evolution of this gene, in order to identify important factors contributing to the spurious reconstructions. Simulation studies using parametric bootstrapping indicate that it is unlikely that the spurious nodes in the parsimony analyses are due to long branches or other topological effects. Rather, they appear to be due to base compositional bias at third positions, codon bias, and convergent evolution at nucleotide positions encoding the hydrophobic residues isoleucine, leucine, and valine. LogDet distance methods, as well as maximum-likelihood methods which allow for nonstationary changes in base composition, reduce but do not entirely eliminate support for the spurious resolutions. Inclusion of five additional rhodopsin sequences in the phylogenetic analyses largely corrected one of the spurious reconstructions while leaving the other unaffected. The additional sequences not only were more proximal to the corrected node, but were also found to have intermediate levels of base composition and codon bias as compared with neighboring sequences on the tree. This study shows that the spurious reconstructions can be corrected either by excluding third positions, as well as those encoding the amino acids Ile, Val, and Leu (which may not be ideal, as these sites can contain useful phylogenetic signal for other parts of the tree), or by the addition of sequences that reduce problems associated with convergent evolution.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
N. C. Sheffield, H. Song, S. L. Cameron, and M. F. Whiting
Nonstationary Evolution and Compositional Heterogeneity in Beetle Mitochondrial Phylogenomics
Syst Biol, August 1, 2009; 58(4): 381 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
V. Gowri-Shankar and M. Rattray
A Reversible Jump Method for Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference with a Nonhomogeneous Substitution Model
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2007; 24(6): 1286 - 1299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
V. Jayaswal, J. Robinson, and L. Jermiin
Estimation of Phylogeny and Invariant Sites under the General Markov Model of Nucleotide Sequence Evolution
Syst Biol, April 1, 2007; 56(2): 155 - 162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
K. F. Gruber, R. S. Voss, and S. A. Jansa
Base-Compositional Heterogeneity in the RAG1 Locus among Didelphid Marsupials: Implications for Phylogenetic Inference and the Evolution of GC Content
Syst Biol, February 1, 2007; 56(1): 83 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
E. S. Tavares, A. J. Baker, S. L. Pereira, and C. Y. Miyaki
Phylogenetic Relationships and Historical Biogeography of Neotropical Parrots (Psittaciformes: Psittacidae: Arini) Inferred from Mitochondrial and Nuclear DNA Sequences
Syst Biol, June 1, 2006; 55(3): 454 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. T. Herbeck, P. H. Degnan, and J. J. Wernegreen
Nonhomogeneous Model of Sequence Evolution Indicates Independent Origins of Primary Endosymbionts Within the Enterobacteriales ({gamma}-Proteobacteria)
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2005; 22(3): 520 - 532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
S. Y.W. Ho and L. S. Jermiin
Tracing the Decay of the Historical Signal in Biological Sequence Data
Syst Biol, August 1, 2004; 53(4): 623 - 637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
L. S. Jermiin, S. Y.W. Ho, F. Ababneh, J. Robinson, and A. W.D. Larkum
The Biasing Effect of Compositional Heterogeneity on Phylogenetic Estimates May be Underestimated
Syst Biol, August 1, 2004; 53(4): 638 - 643.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. S. Rosenberg and S. Kumar
Heterogeneity of Nucleotide Frequencies Among Evolutionary Lineages and Phylogenetic Inference
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2003; 20(4): 610 - 621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
E. L. Braun and E. Grotewold
Fungal Zuotin Proteins Evolved from MIDA1-like Factors by Lineage-Specific Loss of MYB Domains
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2001; 18(7): 1401 - 1412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.