Molecular Biology and Evolution 17:1112-1122 (2000)
© 2000 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution
Article |
Molecular Evolution and Phylogeny of the buzzatii Complex (Drosophila repleta Group): A Maximum-Likelihood Approach
Grup de Biologia Evolutiva, Departament de Genètica i Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
The buzzatii complex of the mulleri subgroup (Drosophila repleta group) consists of three clusters of species whose evolutionary relationships are poorly known. We analyzed 2,085 coding nucleotides from the xanthine dehydrogenase (Xdh) gene in the 10 available species of the complex and Drosophila mulleri and Drosophila hydei. We adopted a statistical model-fitting approach within the maximum-likelihood (ML) framework of phylogenetic inference. We first modeled the process of nucleotide substitution using a tree topology which was reasonably accurate. Then we used the most satisfactory description so attained to reconstruct the evolutionary relationships in the buzzatii complex. We found that a minimally realistic description of the substitution process of Xdh should allow six substitution types and different substitution rates for codon positions. Using this description we obtained a strongly supported, fully resolved tree which is congruent with the already-known (yet few) relationships. We also analyzed published data from three mitochondrial cytochrome oxidases (CO I, II, and III). In our analyses, these relatively short DNA sequences failed to discriminate statistically among alternative phylogenies. When the data of these three gene regions are combined with the Xdh sequences, the phylogenetic signal emerging from Xdh becomes reinforced. All four of the gene regions evolve faster in the buzzatii and martensis clusters than in the stalkeri cluster, paralleling the amount of chromosomal evolution.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Casals, M. Caceres, M. H. Manfrin, J. Gonzalez, and A. Ruiz Molecular Characterization and Chromosomal Distribution of Galileo, Kepler and Newton, Three Foldback Transposable Elements of the Drosophila buzzatii Species Complex Genetics, April 1, 2005; 169(4): 2047 - 2059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Piccinali, M. Aguade, and E. Hasson Comparative Molecular Population Genetics of the Xdh Locus in the Cactophilic Sibling Species Drosophila buzzatii and D. koepferae Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2004; 21(1): 141 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Laayouni, E. Hasson, M. Santos, and A. Fontdevila The Evolutionary History of Drosophila buzzatii. XXXV. Inversion Polymorphism and Nucleotide Variability in Different Regions of the Second Chromosome Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2003; 20(6): 931 - 944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Tarrio, F. Rodriguez-Trelles, and F. J. Ayala A new Drosophila spliceosomal intron position is common in plants PNAS, May 27, 2003; 100(11): 6580 - 6583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Casals, M. Caceres, and A. Ruiz The Foldback-like Transposon Galileo Is Involved in the Generation of Two Different Natural Chromosomal Inversions of Drosophila buzzatii Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2003; 20(5): 674 - 685. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Gomez and E. Hasson Transpecific Polymorphisms in an Inversion Linked Esterase Locus in Drosophila buzzatii Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2003; 20(3): 410 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Caceres, M. Puig, and A. Ruiz Molecular Characterization of Two Natural Hotspots in the Drosophila buzzatii Genome Induced by Transposon Insertions Genome Res., August 1, 2001; 11(8): 1353 - 1364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



