Molecular Biology and Evolution 17:782-797 (2000)
© 2000 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution
Original Articles |
Error, Bias, and Long-Branch Attraction in Data for Two Chloroplast Photosystem Genes in Seed Plants


*Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California at Davis;
University/Jepson Herbaria and Museum of Paleontology, University of California at Berkeley;
and
Center for Population Biology, University of California at Davis
Abstract
Sequences of two chloroplast photosystem genes, psaA and psbB, together comprising about 3,500 bp, were obtained for all five major groups of extant seed plants and several outgroups among other vascular plants. Strongly supported, but significantly conflicting, phylogenetic signals were obtained in parsimony analyses from partitions of the data into first and second codon positions versus third positions. In the former, both genes agreed on a monophyletic gymnosperms, with Gnetales closely related to certain conifers. In the latter, Gnetales are inferred to be the sister group of all other seed plants, with gymnosperms paraphyletic. None of the data supported the modern "anthophyte hypothesis," which places Gnetales as the sister group of flowering plants. A series of simulation studies were undertaken to examine the error rate for parsimony inference. Three kinds of errors were examined: random error, systematic bias (both properties of finite data sets), and statistical inconsistency owing to long-branch attraction (an asymptotic property). Parsimony reconstructions were extremely biased for third-position data for psbB. Regardless of the true underlying tree, a tree in which Gnetales are sister to all other seed plants was likely to be reconstructed for these data. None of the combinations of genes or partitions permits the anthophyte tree to be reconstructed with high probability. Simulations of progressively larger data sets indicate the existence of long-branch attraction (statistical inconsistency) for third-position psbB data if either the anthophyte tree or the gymnosperm tree is correct. This is also true for the anthophyte tree using either psaA third positions or psbB first and second positions. A factor contributing to bias and inconsistency is extremely short branches at the base of the seed plant radiation, coupled with extremely high rates in Gnetales and nonseed plant outgroups.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. G. Murdock Phylogeny of marattioid ferns (Marattiaceae): inferring a root in the absence of a closely related outgroup Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2008; 95(5): 626 - 641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. W. Grimm and T. Denk ITS Evolution in Platanus (Platanaceae): Homoeologues, Pseudogenes and Ancient Hybridization Ann. Bot., February 1, 2008; 101(3): 403 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-S. Wu, Y.-N. Wang, S.-M. Liu, and S.-M. Chaw Chloroplast Genome (cpDNA) of Cycas taitungensis and 56 cp Protein-Coding Genes of Gnetum parvifolium: Insights into cpDNA Evolution and Phylogeny of Extant Seed Plants Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2007; 24(6): 1366 - 1379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Bateman, J. Hilton, and P. J. Rudall Morphological and molecular phylogenetic context of the angiosperms: contrasting the 'top-down' and 'bottom-up' approaches used to infer the likely characteristics of the first flowers J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2006; 57(13): 3471 - 3503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Robinson, A. B. Monk, J. E. Cooper, E. J. Feil, and M. C. Enright Evolutionary Genetics of the Accessory Gene Regulator (agr) Locus in Staphylococcus aureus J. Bacteriol., December 15, 2005; 187(24): 8312 - 8321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Leebens-Mack, L. A. Raubeson, L. Cui, J. V. Kuehl, M. H. Fourcade, T. W. Chumley, J. L. Boore, R. K. Jansen, and C. W. dePamphilis Identifying the Basal Angiosperm Node in Chloroplast Genome Phylogenies: Sampling One's Way Out of the Felsenstein Zone Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2005; 22(10): 1948 - 1963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. E. Friedman, R. C. Moore, and M. D. Purugganan The evolution of plant development Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2004; 91(10): 1726 - 1741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Krishnan, H. Seligmann, C.-B. Stewart, A. P. J. de Koning, and D. D. Pollock Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction in Primate Mitochondrial DNA: Compositional Bias and Effect on Functional Inference Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2004; 21(10): 1871 - 1883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Burleigh and S. Mathews Phylogenetic signal in nucleotide data from seed plants: implications for resolving the seed plant tree of life Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2004; 91(10): 1599 - 1613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z.-Q. WANG A New Permian Gnetalean Cone as Fossil Evidence for Supporting Current Molecular Phylogeny Ann. Bot., August 1, 2004; 94(2): 281 - 288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. E. Friedman and J. H. Williams Developmental Evolution of the Sexual Process in Ancient Flowering Plant Lineages PLANT CELL, June 1, 2004; 16(suppl_1): S119 - S132. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Magallon and M. J. Sanderson Relationships among seed plants inferred from highly conserved genes: sorting conflicting phylogenetic signals among ancient lineages Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2002; 89(12): 1991 - 2006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, and M. J. Zanis Phylogeny of seed plants based on evidence from eight genes Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2002; 89(10): 1670 - 1681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. W. Rothwell and R. A. Stockey Anatomically preserved Cycadeoidea (Cycadeoidaceae), with a reevaluation of systematic characters for the seed cones of Bennettitales Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2002; 89(9): 1447 - 1458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Zanis, D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, S. Mathews, and M. J. Donoghue The root of the angiosperms revisited PNAS, May 14, 2002; 99(10): 6848 - 6853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Nyffeler Phylogenetic relationships in the cactus family (Cactaceae) based on evidence from trnK/ matK and trnL-trnF sequences Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2002; 89(2): 312 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Sanderson Estimating Absolute Rates of Molecular Evolution and Divergence Times: A Penalized Likelihood Approach Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2002; 19(1): 101 - 109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Omilian and D. J. Taylor Rate Acceleration and Long-branch Attraction in a Conserved Gene of Cryptic Daphniid (Crustacea) Species Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2001; 18(12): 2201 - 2212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-L. Qiu, J. Lee, B. A. Whitlock, F. Bernasconi-Quadroni, and O. Dombrovska Was the ANITA Rooting of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Affected by Long-Branch Attraction? Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2001; 18(9): 1745 - 1753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Sanderson and J. A. Doyle Sources of error and confidence intervals in estimating the age of angiosperms from rbcL and 18S rDNA data Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2001; 88(8): 1499 - 1516. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Braun and E. Grotewold Fungal Zuotin Proteins Evolved from MIDA1-like Factors by Lineage-Specific Loss of MYB Domains Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2001; 18(7): 1401 - 1412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. R. Hernandez-Castillo, G. W. Rothwell, and G. Mapes Compound pollen cone in a Paleozoic conifer Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2001; 88(6): 1139 - 1142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Nickrent, C. L. Parkinson, J. D. Palmer, and R. J. Duff Multigene Phylogeny of Land Plants with Special Reference to Bryophytes and the Earliest Land Plants Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2000; 17(12): 1885 - 1895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||






