Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Inomata, N.
Right arrow Articles by Yamazaki, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Inomata, N.
Right arrow Articles by Yamazaki, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution 17:601-615 (2000)
© 2000 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


Regular Articles

Evolution of Nucleotide Substitutions and Gene Regulation in the Amylase Multigenes in Drosophila kikkawai and its Sibling Species

Nobuyuki Inomata, and Tsuneyuki Yamazaki

Laboratory of Molecular Population Genetics, Department of Biology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

Abstract

In order to determine evolutionary changes in gene regulation and the nucleotide substitution pattern in a multigene family, the amylase multigenes were characterized in Drosophila kikkawai and its sibling species. The nucleotide substitution pattern was investigated. Drosophila kikkawai has four amylase genes. The Amy1 and Amy2 genes are a head-to-head duplication in the middle of the B arm of the second chromosome, while the Amy3 and Amy4 genes are a tail-to-tail duplication near the centromere of the same chromosome. In the sibling species of D. kikkawai (Drosophila bocki, Drosophila leontia, and Drosophila lini), sequencing of the Amy1, Amy2, Amy3, and Amy4 genes revealed that the Amy1 and Amy2 gene group diverged from Amy3 and Amy4 after duplication. In the Amy1 and Amy2 genes, the divergent evolution occurred in the flanking regions; in contrast, the coding regions have evolved in concerted fashion. The electrophoretic pattern of AMY isozymes was also examined. In D. kikkawai and its siblings, two or three electrophoretically different isozymes are encoded by the Amy1 and Amy2 genes (S isozyme) and by the Amy3 and Amy4 genes (F (M) isozymes). The S and F (M) isozymes show different patterns of band intensity when larvae and flies were fed in different media. Amy1 and Amy2, which encode the S isozyme, are more strikingly regulated than Amy3 and Amy4, which encode the F (M) isozyme. The GC content and codon usage bias were higher for the Amy1 and Amy2 genes than for the Amy3 and Amy4 genes. Although the ratio of synonymous and replacement substitutions within the Amy1 and Amy2 gene group was not significantly different from that within the Amy3 and Amy4 gene group, the synonymous substitution rate in the lineage of Amy1 and Amy2 was lower than that of Amy3 and Amy4. In conclusion, after the first duplication but before speciation of four species, the synonymous substitution rate between the two lineages and the electrophoretic pattern of the isozymes encoded by them changed, although we do not know whether there was any evolutionary relationship between the two.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
E. S. Balakirev, V. R. Chechetkin, V. V. Lobzin, and F. J. Ayala
Entropy and GC Content in the {beta}-esterase Gene Cluster of the Drosophila melanogaster Subgroup
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2005; 22(10): 2063 - 2072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J HeredHome page
H. Araki, S. Yoshizumi, N. Inomata, and T. Yamazaki
Genetic Coadaptation of the Amylase Gene System in Drosophila melanogaster: Evidence for the Selective Advantage of the Lowest AMY Activity and of Its Epistatic Genetic Background
J. Hered., July 1, 2005; 96(4): 388 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
Z. Zhang and H. Kishino
Genomic Background Drives the Divergence of Duplicated Amylase Genes at Synonymous Sites in Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2004; 21(2): 222 - 227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
Z. Zhang, N. Inomata, T. Ohba, M.-L. Cariou, and T. Yamazaki
Codon Bias Differentiates Between the Duplicated Amylase Loci Following Gene Duplication in Drosophila
Genetics, July 1, 2002; 161(3): 1187 - 1196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
N. Inomata and T. Yamazaki
Nucleotide Variation of the Duplicated Amylase Genes in Drosophila kikkawai
Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2002; 19(5): 678 - 688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. Munte, M. Aguade, and C. Segarra
Changes in the Recombinational Environment Affect Divergence in the yellow Gene of Drosophila
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2001; 18(6): 1045 - 1056.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
H. Araki, N. Inomata, and T. Yamazaki
Molecular Evolution of Duplicated Amylase Gene Regions in Drosophila melanogaster: Evidence of Positive Selection in the Coding Regions and Selective Constraints in the cis-Regulatory Regions
Genetics, February 1, 2001; 157(2): 667 - 677.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.