Molecular Biology and Evolution 17:511-518 (2000)
© 2000 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution
Regular Articles |
Early Fixation of an Optimal Genetic Code
*Department of Ecology and Evolution, Princeton University;
and
Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, England
Abstract
The evolutionary forces that produced the canonical genetic code before the last universal ancestor remain obscure. One hypothesis is that the arrangement of amino acid/codon assignments results from selection to minimize the effects of errors (e.g., mistranslation and mutation) on resulting proteins. If amino acid similarity is measured as polarity, the canonical code does indeed outperform most theoretical alternatives. However, this finding does not hold for other amino acid properties, ignores plausible restrictions on possible code structure, and does not address the naturally occurring nonstandard genetic codes. Finally, other analyses have shown that significantly better code structures are possible. Here, we show that if theoretically possible code structures are limited to reflect plausible biological constraints, and amino acid similarity is quantified using empirical data of substitution frequencies, the canonical code is at or very close to a global optimum for error minimization across plausible parameter space. This result is robust to variation in the methods and assumptions of the analysis. Although significantly better codes do exist under some assumptions, they are extremely rare and thus consistent with reports of an adaptive code: previous analyses which suggest otherwise derive from a misleading metric. However, all extant, naturally occurring, secondarily derived, nonstandard genetic codes do appear less adaptive. The arrangement of amino acid assignments to the codons of the standard genetic code appears to be a direct product of natural selection for a system that minimizes the phenotypic impact of genetic error. Potential criticisms of previous analyses appear to be without substance. That known variants of the standard genetic code appear less adaptive suggests that different evolutionary factors predominated before and after fixation of the canonical code. While the evidence for an adaptive code is clear, the process by which the code achieved this optimization requires further attention.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. L. Ring and A. R. O. Cavalcanti Consequences of Stop Codon Reassignment on Protein Evolution in Ciliates with Alternative Genetic Codes Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2008; 25(1): 179 - 186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Itzkovitz and U. Alon The genetic code is nearly optimal for allowing additional information within protein-coding sequences Genome Res., April 1, 2007; 17(4): 405 - 412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Bofkin and N. Goldman Variation in Evolutionary Processes at Different Codon Positions Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2007; 24(2): 513 - 521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Gavish, A. Peled, and B. Chor Genetic code symmetry and efficient design of GC-constrained coding sequences Bioinformatics, January 15, 2007; 23(2): e57 - e63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 U. Hershberg and M. J. Shlomchik Differences in potential for amino acid change after mutation reveals distinct strategies for {kappa} and {lambda} light-chain variation PNAS, October 24, 2006; 103(43): 15963 - 15968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Vetsigian, C. Woese, and N. Goldenfeld Collective evolution and the genetic code PNAS, July 11, 2006; 103(28): 10696 - 10701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. J. Vermeij Historical contingency and the purported uniqueness of evolutionary innovations PNAS, February 7, 2006; 103(6): 1804 - 1809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Sengupta and P. G. Higgs A Unified Model of Codon Reassignment in Alternative Genetic Codes Genetics, June 1, 2005; 170(2): 831 - 840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Segre, D. Vitkup, and G. M. Church Analysis of optimality in natural and perturbed metabolic networks PNAS, November 12, 2002; 99(23): 15112 - 15117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Moreira, S. Kervestin, O. Jean-Jean, and H. Philippe Evolution of Eukaryotic Translation Elongation and Termination Factors: Variations of Evolutionary Rate and Genetic Code Deviations Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2002; 19(2): 189 - 200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. A. Line The enigma of the origin of life and its timing Microbiology, January 1, 2002; 148(1): 21 - 27. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. P. Kennedy, W. V. Ng, S. L. Salzberg, L. Hood, and S. DasSarma Understanding the Adaptation of Halobacterium Species NRC-1 to Its Extreme Environment through Computational Analysis of Its Genome Sequence Genome Res., October 1, 2001; 11(10): 1641 - 1650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. A. Ronneberg, L. F. Landweber, and S. J. Freeland Testing a biosynthetic theory of the genetic code: Fact or artifact? PNAS, November 16, 2000; (2000) 250403097. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. A. Ronneberg, L. F. Landweber, and S. J. Freeland Testing a biosynthetic theory of the genetic code: Fact or artifact? PNAS, December 5, 2000; 97(25): 13690 - 13695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|