Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (36)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alba, R.
Right arrow Articles by Pratt, L. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alba, R.
Right arrow Articles by Pratt, L. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution 17:362-373 (2000)
© 2000 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


Articles

The Phytochrome Gene Family in Tomato and the Rapid Differential Evolution of this Family in Angiosperms

Rob Alba1,, Peter M. Kelmenson, Marie-Michèle Cordonnier-Pratt and Lee H. Pratt4,

Department of Botany, University of Georgia

A reexamination of the genome of the tomato (renamed Solanum lycopersicum L.) indicates that it contains five, or at most perhaps six, phytochrome genes (PHY), each encoding a different apoprotein (PHY). Five previously identified tomato PHY genes have been designated PHYA, PHYB1, PHYB2, PHYE, and PHYF. A molecular phylogenetic analysis is consistent with the hypothesis that the angiosperm PHY family is composed of four subfamilies (A, B, C/F, and E). Southern analyses indicate that the tomato genome does not contain both a PHYC and a PHYF. Molecular phylogenetic analyses presented here, which utilize for the first time full-length PHY sequences from two completely characterized angiosperm gene families, indicate that tomato PHYF is probably an ortholog of Arabidopsis PHYC. They also confirm that the angiosperm PHY family is undergoing relatively rapid differential evolution. Assuming PHYF is an ortholog of PHYC, PHY genes in eudicots are evolving (Ka/site) at 1.52–2.79 times the rate calculated as average for other plant nuclear genes. Again assuming PHYF is an ortholog of PHYC, the rate of evolution of the C and E subfamilies is at least 1.33 times the rate of the A and B subfamilies. PHYA and PHYB in eudicots are evolving at least 1.45 times as fast as their counterparts in the Poaceae. PHY functional domains also exhibit different evolutionary rates. The C-terminal region of angiosperm PHY (codons 800–1105) is evolving at least 2.11 times as fast as the photosensory domain (codons 200–500). The central region of a domain essential for phytochrome signal transduction (codons 652–712) is also evolving rapidly. Nonsynonymous substitutions occur in this region at 2.03–3.75 times the average rate for plant nuclear genes. It is not known if this rapid evolution results from selective pressure or from the absence of evolutionary constraint.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
H. Ikeda, N. Fujii, and H. Setoguchi
Molecular Evolution of Phytochromes in Cardamine nipponica (Brassicaceae) Suggests the Involvement of PHYE in Local Adaptation
Genetics, June 1, 2009; 182(2): 603 - 614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. L. Filiault, C. A. Wessinger, J. R. Dinneny, J. Lutes, J. O. Borevitz, D. Weigel, J. Chory, and J. N. Maloof
Amino acid polymorphisms in Arabidopsis phytochrome B cause differential responses to light
PNAS, February 26, 2008; 105(8): 3157 - 3162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
M. Takano, N. Inagaki, X. Xie, N. Yuzurihara, F. Hihara, T. Ishizuka, M. Yano, M. Nishimura, A. Miyao, H. Hirochika, et al.
Distinct and Cooperative Functions of Phytochromes A, B, and C in the Control of Deetiolation and Flowering in Rice
PLANT CELL, December 1, 2005; 17(12): 3311 - 3325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. Zhang, R. Nielsen, and Z. Yang
Evaluation of an Improved Branch-Site Likelihood Method for Detecting Positive Selection at the Molecular Level
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2005; 22(12): 2472 - 2479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. J. Sheehan, P. R. Farmer, and T. P. Brutnell
Structure and Expression of Maize Phytochrome Family Homeologs
Genetics, July 1, 2004; 167(3): 1395 - 1405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
G. M. White, M. T. Hamblin, and S. Kresovich
Molecular Evolution of the Phytochrome Gene Family in Sorghum: Changing Rates of Synonymous and Replacement Evolution
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2004; 21(4): 716 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
A. Srinivas, R. K. Behera, T. Kagawa, M. Wada, and R. Sharma
High Pigment1 Mutation Negatively Regulates Phototropic Signal Transduction in Tomato Seedlings
Plant Physiology, February 1, 2004; 134(2): 790 - 800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
N. Frankel, E. Hasson, N. D. Iusem, and M. S. Rossi
Adaptive Evolution of the Water Stress-Induced Gene Asr2 in Lycopersicon Species Dwelling in Arid Habitats
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2003; 20(12): 1955 - 1962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
J. Schmitt, J. R. Stinchcombe, M. S. Heschel, and H. Huber
The Adaptive Evolution of Plasticity: Phytochrome-Mediated Shade Avoidance Responses
Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2003; 43(3): 459 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. Mathews, J. G. Burleigh, and M. J. Donoghue
Adaptive Evolution in the Photosensory Domain of Phytochrome A in Early Angiosperms
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2003; 20(7): 1087 - 1097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
R. A. Sharrock and T. Clack
Patterns of Expression and Normalized Levels of the Five Arabidopsis Phytochromes
Plant Physiology, September 1, 2002; 130(1): 442 - 456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
S. Christensen, E. LaVerne, G. Boyd, and J. Silverthorne
Ginkgo biloba Retains Functions of Both Type I and Type II Flowering Plant Phytochrome
Plant Cell Physiol., July 15, 2002; 43(7): 768 - 777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
Z. Yang and R. Nielsen
Codon-Substitution Models for Detecting Molecular Adaptation at Individual Sites Along Specific Lineages
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2002; 19(6): 908 - 917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
B. L. Montgomery, K. A. Franklin, M. J. Terry, B. Thomas, S. D. Jackson, M. W. Crepeau, and J. C. Lagarias
Biliverdin Reductase-Induced Phytochrome Chromophore Deficiency in Transgenic Tobacco
Plant Physiology, January 1, 2001; 125(1): 266 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.