Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Corneli, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Corneli, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, R. H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution 17:224-234 (2000)
© 2000 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution

ARTICLES

Mitochondrial Genes and Mammalian Phylogenies: Increasing the Reliability of Branch Length Estimation

Patrice Showers Corneli,* and Ryk H. Ward*{dagger}

*Department of Biology, University of Utah; and
{dagger}Institute of Biological Anthropology, University of Oxford

Since branch lengths provide important information about the timing and the extent of evolutionary divergence among taxa, accurate resolution of evolutionary history depends as much on branch length estimates as on recovery of the correct topology. However, the empirical relationship between the choice of genes to sequence and the quality of branch length estimation remains ill defined. To address this issue, we evaluated the accuracy of branch lengths estimated from subsets of the mitochondrial genome for a mammalian phylogeny with known subordinal relationships. Using maximum-likelihood methods, we estimated branch lengths from an 11-kb sequence of all 13 protein-coding genes and compared them with estimates from single genes (0.2–1.8 kb) and from 7 different combinations of genes (2–3.5 kb). For each sequence, we separated the component of the log-likelihood deviation due to branch length differences associated with alternative topologies from that due to those that are independent of the topology. Even among the sequences that recovered the same tree topology, some produced significantly better branch length estimates than others did. The combination of correct topology and significantly better branch length estimation suggests that these gene combinations may prove useful in estimating phylogenetic relationships for mammalian divergences below the ordinal level. Thus, the proper choice of genes to sequence is a critical factor for reliable estimation of evolutionary history from molecular data.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Bulletin de la Societe Geologique de FranceHome page
G. Nelson and P. Y. Ladiges
Biogeography and the molecular dating game: a futile revival of phenetics?
Bulletin de la Societe Geologique de France, January 1, 2009; 180(1): 39 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
T. Pupko, D. Huchon, Y. Cao, N. Okada, and M. Hasegawa
Combining Multiple Data Sets in a Likelihood Analysis: Which Models are the Best?
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2002; 19(12): 2294 - 2307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.