Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frohlich, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Estabrook, G. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frohlich, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Estabrook, G. F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution 17:1914-1925 (2000)
© 2000 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution

ARTICLE

Wilkinson Support Calculated with Exact Probabilities: An Example Using Floricaula/LEAFY Amino Acid Sequences that Compares Three Hypotheses Involving Gene Gain/Loss in Seed Plants

Michael W. Frohlich and George F. Estabrook

Herbarium and Department of Biology, University of Michigan

This paper describes a method for quantifying the extent to which a character supports a hypothesized monophyletic group. The basic idea was first proposed by Wilkinson in 1998; hence, we call it Wilkinson support. A character provides Wilkinson support if it could have changed state on the branch leading to the hypothesized monophyletic group without requiring any extra steps in an evolutionary tree. We describe a method to determine the exact probability that a character would provide Wilkinson support for a random group of the same size as the hypothesized monophyletic group. A character's weight is defined as the negative natural log of this probability. The sum over all characters of these weights in a data set is a measure of total weighted support. We exemplify this method using 30 Floricaula/LEAFY amino acid sequences. One copy of this gene occurs in angiosperms, but two copies occur in the other four seed plant groups. Angiosperms could have been primitively single-copy or could have lost either of the two paralogs. These possibilities correspond to three hypotheses of monophyly. We use total weighted Wilkinson support to evaluate these three hypotheses, and all three are shown to be significantly different from random as individual hypothesized monophyletic groups. Comparing these three hypotheses for total weighted support reveals that one has much more support than do the other two. This hypothesis favors the "mostly-male" theory of flowering-plant origins.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ScienceHome page
A. Maizel, M. A. Busch, T. Tanahashi, J. Perkovic, M. Kato, M. Hasebe, and D. Weigel
The Floral Regulator LEAFY Evolves by Substitutions in the DNA Binding Domain
Science, April 8, 2005; 308(5719): 260 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.