Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (32)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mugridge, N. B.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mugridge, N. B.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, A. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution 17:1842-1853 (2000)
© 2000 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ARTICLE

Effects of Sequence Alignment and Structural Domains of Ribosomal DNA on Phylogeny Reconstruction for the Protozoan Family Sarcocystidae

N. B. Mugridge, D. A. Morrison, T. Jäkel, A. R. Heckeroth, A. M. Tenter and A. M. Johnson2,

*Molecular Parasitology Unit, University of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia;
{dagger}Division of Parasitology, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany; and
{ddagger}Institut für Parasitologie, Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany

Finding correct species relationships using phylogeny reconstruction based on molecular data is dependent on several empirical and technical factors. These include the choice of DNA sequence from which phylogeny is to be inferred, the establishment of character homology within a sequence alignment, and the phylogeny algorithm used. Nevertheless, sequencing and phylogeny tools provide a way of testing certain hypotheses regarding the relationship among the organisms for which phenotypic characters demonstrate conflicting evolutionary information. The protozoan family Sarcocystidae is one such group for which molecular data have been applied phylogenetically to resolve questionable relationships. However, analyses carried out to date, particularly based on small-subunit ribosomal DNA, have not resolved all of the relationships within this family. Analysis of more than one gene is necessary in order to obtain a robust species signal, and some DNA sequences may not be appropriate in terms of their phylogenetic information content. With this in mind, we tested the informativeness of our chosen molecule, the large-subunit ribosomal DNA (lsu rDNA), by using subdivisions of the sequence in phylogenetic analysis through PAUP, fastDNAml, and neighbor joining. The segments of sequence applied correspond to areas of higher nucleotide variation in a secondary-structure alignment involving 21 taxa. We found that subdivision of the entire lsu rDNA is inappropriate for phylogenetic analysis of the Sarcocystidae. There are limited informative nucleotide sites in the lsu rDNA for certain clades, such as the one encompassing the subfamily Toxoplasmatinae. Consequently, the removal of any segment of the alignment compromises the final tree topology. We also tested the effect of using two different alignment procedures (CLUSTAL W and the structure alignment using DCSE) and three different tree-building methods on the final tree topology. This work shows that congruence between different methods in the formation of clades may be a feature of robust topology; however, a sequence alignment based on primary structure may not be comparing homologous nucleotides even though the expected topology is obtained. Our results support previous findings showing the paraphyly of the current genera Sarcocystis and Hammondia and again bring to question the relationships of Sarcocystis muris, Isospora felis, and Neospora caninum. In addition, results based on phylogenetic analysis of the structure alignment suggest that Sarcocystis zamani and Sarcocystis singaporensis, which have reptilian definitive hosts, are monophyletic with Sarcocystis species using mammalian definitive hosts if the genus Frenkelia is synonymized with Sarcocystis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
K. M. Wong, M. A. Suchard, and J. P. Huelsenbeck
Alignment Uncertainty and Genomic Analysis
Science, January 25, 2008; 319(5862): 473 - 476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
T. H. Ogden and M. S. Rosenberg
Alignment and Topological Accuracy of the Direct Optimization approach via POY and Traditional Phylogenetics via ClustalW + PAUP
Syst Biol, April 1, 2007; 56(2): 182 - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
T. H. Ogden and M. S. Rosenberg
Multiple Sequence Alignment Accuracy and Phylogenetic Inference
Syst Biol, April 1, 2006; 55(2): 314 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
K. M. Kjer
Aligned 18S and Insect Phylogeny
Syst Biol, June 1, 2004; 53(3): 506 - 514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
H.-Y. Wang and S.-C. Lee
Secondary Structure of Mitochondrial 12S rRNA Among Fish and Its Phylogenetic Applications
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2002; 19(2): 138 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. R. Omilian and D. J. Taylor
Rate Acceleration and Long-branch Attraction in a Conserved Gene of Cryptic Daphniid (Crustacea) Species
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2001; 18(12): 2201 - 2212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
T. Jakel, E. Wallstein, F. Muncheberg, C. Archer-Baumann, B. Weingarten, D. Kliemt, and U. Mackenstedt
Binding of a Monoclonal Antibody to Sporozoites of Sarcocystis singaporensis Enhances Escape from the Parasitophorous Vacuole, Which Is Necessary for Intracellular Development
Infect. Immun., October 1, 2001; 69(10): 6475 - 6482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.