Molecular Biology and Evolution 17:1610-1619 (2000)
© 2000 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution
ARTICLE |
Evolution of Sequence Recognition by Restriction-Modification Enzymes: Selective Pressure for Specificity Decrease
Department of Molecular Biology, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Several type II restriction-modification (RM) gene complexes kill host bacterial cells that have lost them, through attack on the chromosomal recognition sites of these cells. Two RM gene complexes recognizing the same sequence cannot simultaneously enjoy such stabilization through postsegregational host killing, because one will defend chromosomal sites from attack by the other. In the present work, we analyzed intrahost competition between two RM gene complexes when the recognition sequence of one was included in that of the other. When the EcoRII gene complex, recognizing 5'-CCWGG (W = A, T), is lost from the host, the SsoII gene complex, which recognizes 5'-CCNGG (N = A, T, G, C), will prevent host death by protecting CCWGG sites on the chromosome. However, when the SsoII (CCNGG) gene complex is lost, the EcoRII (CCWGG) gene complex will be unable to prevent host death through attack by SsoII on 5'-CCSGG (S = C, G) sites. These predictions were verified in our experiments, in which we analyzed plasmid maintenance, cell growth, cell shape, and chromosomal DNA. Our results demonstrate the presence of selective pressure for decrease in the specificity of recognition sequence of RM systems in the absence of invading DNA.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Takahashi, H. Matsuno, H. Furusawa, and Y. Okahata Direct Monitoring of Allosteric Recognition of Type IIE Restriction Endonuclease EcoRII J. Biol. Chem., May 30, 2008; 283(22): 15023 - 15030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ohno, N. Handa, M. Watanabe-Matsui, N. Takahashi, and I. Kobayashi Maintenance Forced by a Restriction-Modification System Can Be Modulated by a Region in Its Modification Enzyme Not Essential for Methyltransferase Activity J. Bacteriol., March 15, 2008; 190(6): 2039 - 2049. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ichige and I. Kobayashi Stability of EcoRI Restriction-Modification Enzymes In Vivo Differentiates the EcoRI Restriction-Modification System from Other Postsegregational Cell Killing Systems J. Bacteriol., October 1, 2005; 187(19): 6612 - 6621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nikolajewa, A. Beyer, M. Friedel, J. Hollunder, and T. Wilhelm Common patterns in type II restriction enzyme binding sites Nucleic Acids Res., May 11, 2005; 33(8): 2726 - 2733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Takahashi, Y. Naito, N. Handa, and I. Kobayashi A DNA Methyltransferase Can Protect the Genome from Postdisturbance Attack by a Restriction-Modification Gene Complex J. Bacteriol., November 15, 2002; 184(22): 6100 - 6108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Kobayashi Behavior of restriction-modification systems as selfish mobile elements and their impact on genome evolution Nucleic Acids Res., September 15, 2001; 29(18): 3742 - 3756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


