Molecular Biology and Evolution 17:2-22 (2000)
© 2000 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution
Review Article |
Population Bottlenecks and Pleistocene Human Evolution
*Department of Anthropology, University of Utah;
and
Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan;
and
Department of Biosystems Science, Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Kanagawa, Japan
We review the anatomical and archaeological evidence for an early population bottleneck in humans and bracket the time when it could have occurred. We outline the subsequent demographic changes that the archaeological evidence of range expansions and contractions address, and we examine how inbreeding effective population size provides an alternative view of past population size change. This addresses the question of other, more recent, population size bottlenecks, and we review nonrecombining and recombining genetic systems that may reflect them. We examine how these genetic data constrain the possibility of significant population size bottlenecks (i.e., of sufficiently small size and/or long duration to minimize genetic variation in autosomal and haploid systems) at several different critical times in human history. Different constraints appear in nonrecombining and recombining systems, and among the autosomal loci most are incompatible with any Pleistocene population size expansions. Microsatellite data seem to show Pleistocene population size expansions, but in aggregate they are difficult to interpret because different microsatellite studies do not show the same expansion. The archaeological data are only compatible with a few of these analyses, most prominently with data from Alu elements, and we use these facts to question whether the view of the past from analysis of inbreeding effective population size is valid. Finally, we examine the issue of whether inbreeding effective population size provides any reasonable measure of the actual past size of the human species. We contend that if the evidence of a population size bottleneck early in the evolution of our lineage is accepted, most genetic data either lack the resolution to address subsequent changes in the human population or do not meet the assumptions required to do so validly. It is our conclusion that, at the moment, genetic data cannot disprove a simple model of exponential population growth following a bottleneck 2 MYA at the origin of our lineage and extending through the Pleistocene. Archaeological and paleontological data indicate that this model is too oversimplified to be an accurate reflection of detailed population history, and therefore we find that genetic data lack the resolution to validly reflect many details of Pleistocene human population change. However, there is one detail that these data are sufficient to address. Both genetic and anthropological data are incompatible with the hypothesis of a recent population size bottleneck. Such an event would be expected to leave a significant mark across numerous genetic loci and observable anatomical traits, but while some subsets of data are compatible with a recent population size bottleneck, there is no consistently expressed effect that can be found across the range where it should appear, and this absence disproves the hypothesis.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. S. Premo and J.-J. Hublin Culture, population structure, and low genetic diversity in Pleistocene hominins PNAS, January 6, 2009; 106(1): 33 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Morin Evidence for declines in human population densities during the early Upper Paleolithic in western Europe PNAS, January 8, 2008; 105(1): 48 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Bibliographical References Diogenes, May 1, 2007; 54(2): 147 - 166. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Ray, M. Currat, P. Berthier, and L. Excoffier Recovering the geographic origin of early modern humans by realistic and spatially explicit simulations Genome Res., August 1, 2005; 15(8): 1161 - 1167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Wakeley Recent Trends in Population Genetics: More Data! More Math! Simple Models? J. Hered., September 1, 2004; 95(5): 397 - 405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Wakeley and S. Lessard Theory of the Effects of Population Structure and Sampling on Patterns of Linkage Disequilibrium Applied to Genomic Data From Humans Genetics, July 1, 2003; 164(3): 1043 - 1053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 The pattern of evolution in Pleistocene human brain size Paleobiology, June 1, 2003; 29(2): 186 - 196.
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Caramelli, C. Lalueza-Fox, C. Vernesi, M. Lari, A. Casoli, F. Mallegni, B. Chiarelli, I. Dupanloup, J. Bertranpetit, G. Barbujani, et al. Evidence for a genetic discontinuity between Neandertals and 24,000-year-old anatomically modern Europeans PNAS, May 27, 2003; 100(11): 6593 - 6597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Wakeley and T. Takahashi Gene Genealogies When the Sample Size Exceeds the Effective Size of the Population Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2003; 20(2): 208 - 213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L.B. Jorde, W.S. Watkins, and M.J. Bamshad Population genomics: a bridge from evolutionary history to genetic medicine Hum. Mol. Genet., October 1, 2001; 10(20): 2199 - 2207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Takahata, S.-H. Lee, and Y. Satta Testing Multiregionality of Modern Human Origins Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2001; 18(2): 172 - 183. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. J. Adcock, E. S. Dennis, S. Easteal, G. A. Huttley, L. S. Jermiin, W. J. Peacock, and A. Thorne From the Cover: Mitochondrial DNA sequences in ancient Australians: Implications for modern human origins PNAS, January 16, 2001; 98(2): 537 - 542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Barbujani and G. Bertorelle From the Cover: Genetics and the population history of Europe PNAS, January 2, 2001; 98(1): 22 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Alonso and J. A. L. Armour A highly variable segment of human subterminal 16p reveals a history of population growth for modern humans outside Africa PNAS, December 14, 2000; (2000) 11244998. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. Wall and M. Przeworski When Did the Human Population Size Start Increasing? Genetics, August 1, 2000; 155(4): 1865 - 1874. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Alonso and J. A. L. Armour A highly variable segment of human subterminal 16p reveals a history of population growth for modern humans outside Africa PNAS, January 30, 2001; 98(3): 864 - 869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|